Silver State News Service Reno - Las Vegas - Elko - Laughlin ILIPS Group International Special Edition ~ Extra 7
|
| Updated December 5, 2009 |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
![]() A Good Day in Court Together, they're fighting corruption in the Washoe County Social Service System and at the Washoe County District Attorney's Office. On Novembeer 19, 2009, they had a good day in Court! Photo: M. Daniels / ILIPS Group International |
| State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas A Good Day in Court! Ken Stover presents Karen Lekas to the Court of the Honorable Judge Patrick Flannagan for the first time since the case involving State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas began.
Major Breaking News Report:
The case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas finally went before a Judge on November 19, 2009, over a year-and-a-half after it first began, with a Motion to Dismiss presented for consideration by Washoe District Court Judge Patrick Flannagan by Lekas' Attorney, Ken Stover, Esq., of Reno, Nevada. The Motion to Dismiss was ultimately denied by the Judge, but most likely to Mrs. Lekas' benefit as a dismissal doesn't answer the charges against her like a Trial with Jury would. An acquittal on all charges would benefit Karen Lekas far more than a dismissal on the charges of Prosecutorial Misconduct by the Office of Washoe County District Attorney Richard A. Gammick ever would. In that way, there would never again be any doubt as to her innocence or her guilt and the charge could not be held over her head for the remainder of her life, something that would adversely affect her ability to gain work as a Registered Nurse, which is currently on hold due to Washoe Coiunty CPS maintaining this Criminal, Felony charge against her, despite her obvious innocence. There was no issue that misconduct by Gammick's office and Washoe County Child Protective Services (CPS) had occurred. The questions in Judge Flannagan's mind were predominantly 1) "Have Mrs. Lekas' Civil Rights been violated and 2) has her entitlement to a Fair Trial been compromised by Prosecutorial Misconduct?, and finally, 3) are there Civil remedies that she can pursue to avoid dismissing on such grounds?" Though the Civil Rights violations were not shown in Court to Judge Flannagan's satisfaction, it is the opinion of this Newspaper that Mrs. Lekas rights to Due Process, Equal Protection and the compulsory attendance of hostile witnesses in her favor ~ along with their compulsory, honest testimony ~ were indeed compromised. However, that was not the opinion of the Judge, who made it clear that he has dismissed cases before, with one in particular being challegened at the Nevada State Supreme Court, where the Judge prevailed in his dismissal on grounds of Prosecutorial Misconduct. Judge Flannagan indicated that he was prepared to dismiss in this case if Prosecutorial Misconduct were proven in such a manner that Mrs. Lekas' right to a Fair Trial had been violated. At this point in time, with the matter having not yet been set for Trial, in the Judge's mind, the opportunity for Mrs. Lekas to have a Fair and Equitable Trial still existed due to the power of the Court to assist Mrs. Lekas in obtaining her rights against Washoe County and the fact that Gammick's office had disqualified itself from the matter. However, there was no mention of the fact in Court that Gammick's office may have perjured itself in that, the District Attorney continues to involve itself in the matter of the CPS case against Mrs. Lekas. Discussions are underway between Mrs. Lekas and Attorney Stover as to further pursuit in terms of a disqualification of the District Attorney from the CPS case as well, where the D.A. continues to send representatives to sit in on meetings, where such representatives have been observed as avoiding their responsibility to "sign in" officially to such meetings. In regards to the Washoe County CPS and the D.A. failing to turn over records to Stover and his client, while simultaneously, giving such Privacy Act-protected records to the wife of Mrs. Lekas' new husband, David Sharra (formerly David Mawhorter, by adoption ~ he has since taken the name of his natural father ~ Ed.), for use against him in a Child Custody case, has further inflamed the matter with Stover citing transcripts from the hearing where the California prosecutor made reference to "voluminous" records from Lekas' case being given to Mawhorter. The only source was Washoe County Social Services and its Workers, and though one of the perpetrators has now been identified, all appearances are that the perpetrator is a fugitive from Justice being aided and abetted by the County, which claims to have fired her, though no confirmation and no cause otherwise given. Stover was only informed of this fact after issuing a subpoena for her testimony, compulsory according to the Bill of Rights (U.S. Constitution, First Ten Amendments ~ Ed.). The Judge's solution to this problem was to aid Stover and his client by giving the full power and weight of the Court to Stover, who was subsequently given an order that he can now finance the pursuit of Private Investigators, Subpoenas for both Witnesses and Evidence, Expert Witnesses in particular, all through funding (now Court-ordered) as provided by the very State attempting to prosecute the matter following the D.A. disqualifying himself from the case. Not only did Stover demonstrate both he and his client's frustration over the Washoe County CPS's withholding of evidence in this case ~ which both the Attorney and his Client have a Civil Right to ~ and failure by Superiors to address misconduct by its office, and also by the Foster parents Michelle and Randy Hill, the latter of whom (Michelle in particular) were caught demonstrating and playing "Beer Pong" with two of Mrs. Lekas' children and at least one underaged minor present. The Foster parents were "dimissed" for purposes of "C-Y-A" ("Cover Your A$$") by Washoe County, but CPS still allows them contact with the children. The children had been taken away based on false allegations of Mrs. Lekas giving alcohol to Sharra's four-year-old daughter, and then were placed with a Foster family possessing and living in an alcohol culture. Even the State Attorney General and its representative held sympathy for Mrs. Lekas and suggested Civil Remedies as being more appropriate than case dismissal. The State's argument won out nonetheless and no one in the Court seemed adverse to it, not even Mrs. Lekas, who is determined to prove her innocence, as is her Attorney, keeping in mind that both the Judge and the State ~ the latter of which took over following D.A. Gammick's disqualification ~ see the need for a trial by Jury and a final closure to this case through either conviction or acquittal, the acquittal appearing very likely at this time of writing... ...with the noble caveat of course, that one should never second guess a Judge or a seated Jury. The most shocking relevation against the case of the Washoe County D.A. and CPS (Social Services or "SS") is this: Susan Youngflesh, the Washoe County CPS worker that was identified by Stover as the very one who violated Local, State and Federal Privacy Act provisions, in giving Mrs. Lekas' case records to David Sharra's ex-wife, Bobbie Mawhorter, who utilized those records ~ as evidence by a Court transcript and Stover's investigation into the matter ~ against Sharra, in unlawfully obtaining custody of their Daughter from Sharra, who has been persecuted by a Court in California over his marriage to Karen Lekas (Mawhorter) Sharra, and was forced by Washoe County CPS to Divorce him... ...a fact presented into evidence before Judge Flannagan's Court by Stover on the day of Motion. The shocking part of the revelation: Ms. Youngflesh has been fired by CPS. Stover was not notified until after he had issued his Subpoena. CPS is withholding reason for the cause of firing from Stover, beyond the fact, they never notified him of the firing. And CPS is claiming that they don't know where Ms. Youngflesh is and therefore, cannot present her. Stover countered before the Judge that CPS identified Youngflesh only as being in the Las Vegas area, and the Judge, who was not incensed, but obviously not buying CPS' story, answered with an order that the State will now pay for Mrs. Lekas' costs in issuing Subpoenas, obtaining Witnesses, and more importantly, a Private Investigator, the latter of which will be utilized in tracking Ms. Youngflesh down. As for what Ms. Youngflesh may offer in the way of "C-Y-A," the name or names of those associated with and assisting the efforts, if not directly and deliberately ordering it. Which is why Washoe County CPS' efforts smack of cover-up and stonewalling, not the legitimate conduct of a Public Agency, charged with upholding the Law and Social Order of our present day and future Society. The writing is quite clearly on the wall as Stover presented more than just CPS' failures in providing evidence, witnesses and their "honest" testimony. Stover outlined for the Judge the dirty tactics exercised by CPS against Mrs. Lekas, including the taking of all four children based on false allegations that she had given alcohol to Sharra's four-year-old daughter; the forced Divorce from Sharra based on false allegations and a fraudulent conviction (Sharra was not served and was therefore, unknowing of the case against him and not in Court ~ Ed.) for alleged "inappropriate touching" of Lekas' daughter, Lexus, which the child has denied ever occurred; followed by the loss of her job with the listing of her Felony charges preventing most employers from considering her for employment due to the liability issues that might exist should any conduct by Lekas confirm the charges against her. The rhetorical questions being: "How is an Employer to know (?) ~ and how many are competing against Lekas for every job she applies for?" Lekas is ultimately discriminated against for employment, but not the fault of the Employer, as this conduct of "blacklisting" Mrs. Lekas is the action of the County, and therefore, "The State" and the responsibility of the same, as directed deliberately against her. Though the procedure is meant to have good intent, in the case of false charges, the procedure is hurtful, in that it can be and is presently utilized (against Mrs. Lekas in particular) as a tool against the alleged perpetrator of a crime (Innocent until proven guilty? ~ Ed.), who is in reality, the victim of the crimes of others, including CPS. Such is indeed, currently the case with Mrs. Lekas ~ she has been victimized through and by her own children, three of whom have shown themselves easy to controlled and manipulated, and is subsequently being victimized by Washoe County SS and CPS, not to mention, the Office of Richard A. Gammick, alleged District Attorney and Officer of the Court, of Washoe County... ...the latter of whom possesses a sworn oath to "Uphold the Laws and Constitution of the United States" (approximate ~ Ed.), but whose Office has been doing anything but that duty, in the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas, as well as the CPS case against her... ...the latter of which is proving to be an extremely untenable, personal vendetta against Lekas, for her defiance and ability as such ("The Defiant One"), to embarass the absolute, living hell out of Washoe County, Social Services and CPS, among many others. Normally, its the other way around with the Washoe County SS, like their namesakes, scaring the living hell out of others, without regard to "innocence." Thus, the proverbial "shoe" is (now) on the other foot," and at Mrs. Lekas direction, and through her Attorney, kicking the hell out of Washoe County's collective A$$ !!! <g> To think, a Defiant commoner challenging the Princes and Princesses of Washoe County, and bee-yatch slapping the blue-blooded feces out of all of them! <ggg> It's happening right now in Washoe County's own Courts, though this particular Court belongs to a Nobler man, the Honorable Judge Patrick Flannagan, one of the few here that lives up to his title. Stover also attacked the veracity of the Prosecution's key witness in the case, one of Lekas' two sons, who has compromised his version of events with misconduct identified in County records that the County is now refusing to release to Stover and his client, though they are entitled to the evidence by Law, via Discovery. The State Attorney General was likewise, disillushioned by the fact the County had not provided the evidence that both Attorneys need to date, and cited Civil Remedies over Dismissal as a result. To be clear, the State has also not received the information it has requested from Washoe County. Therefore, it's possible that Washoe County officials fear prosecution by the State should they release the information entitled to both camps, particularly the Defense (Lekas). (Editor's Note: The State Attorney General may be interested in this case not as a persecution by the State of Mrs. Lekas, but more importantly, for what may be the unlawful persecution of Mrs. Lekas by the County, which could result in a State case against Washoe County and those responsble, by the State of Nevada Attorney General's Office, as their [County's] actions can and likely will be proven in serious violation of State and Federal Law, especially after the Truth is revealed during Trial.) The defiant Mrs. Lekas was definitely present in Court, offering confirmation of Criminal Attorney Ken Stover's stance on her behalf, and of great interest was, to paraphrase Shakespeare, the Courtroom as Theatre, the Theatre as Life, and those on the stage as all the Players in it. There were but seven players on stage and one member sitting almost as a Groundling in the audience, the latter being this member of the Press. Stover, when making his point, would stand behind his client, place her in the forefront ~ the limelight if you will ~ thrusting both hands in her direction in describing her frustration, while facing the Judge ~ as respectfully required ~ emphasizing, if not hammering, the point of what "My Client has been through," as though travelling through the Mill as though grist, not humanity, for which she is disregarded as "lifeless" in the Washoe County CPS process. If this were a parallel to the movie Shakespeare in Love, then this would have been: "Shakespeare in Disgust," ...especially considering what was being done by Washoe County to his horoine, "Viola," played by the stalwart Mrs. Lekas. The Judge, in the role of kind King Arthur, was calm and quiet throughout, thoughtful as he directed questions prejudice by the "Devil's Advocate's" stance he, along with Stover's honorable, opposing counsel, must take with both sides in arriving at all the answers he seeks to the Constitutional questions he must also address. Each Attorney showed themselves to be profound men, deeply respected by the Judge in their professionalism, duty-bound in their approach to the issues in this case. The Judge commenting on that very fact that its rare when he has two such Attorneys standing before him, arguing opposite sides of the same argument, with the qualities of eloquence and knowledge of Law within their reach and immediate grasp when needed. Another remarkable day in a Washoe County Court, many of which are under constant attack and threat, for either obvious or apparent misconduct, though not this Judge; not his Court; not the Officers of his Court; something (misconduct) not tolerated by him in his Courtroom nor by anyone. Thus, the merging of the Superior Officer of the Court with his two Subordinate Officers, and quality reflected in the questions brought forth by all sides in the proceedings, time and time again. No, Mrs. Lekas's Motion to Dismiss did not prevail, but Mrs. Lekas did nonetheless, since the quality, nobility, itegrity and dignity of the three men, arguing and/or questioning the Legal points made by each other, proved nothing more or less than equally profound for a County level Court. What you had as an audience, all working before you, if you were seated in the Courtroom that day as this Editor was, were three men that existed ~ to paraphrase an old cliche about Hollywood ~ as the "Stuff that Supreme Courts are made of." Nobler thoughts, good intentions and worthy deeds, and/or the unworthy, unlawful deeds of others, discussed in terms of Law. Thus, Mrs. Lekas didn't win the day, but no matter. She won the argument nonetheless and did so with all sides commenting as to the irregularities and frankly, immorality of her oppressors in the Washoe County SS and CPS. This newspaper and its Editor reiterate: though we must attack the system as a whole, only a handful are responsible for the misconduct that has resulted in crimes by the system against individuals like Mrs. Lekas, along with other groups and individuals. There are hundreds still, attempting to perform their duties properly and responsibly in the Washoe County Social Services system. However, as Management attempts to cover-up this misconduct, and hide misconduct behind Law and the facade of the good works of others, we must attack the whole. The State Attorney General is so obviously unhappy with the case presented to her and that State Office's representatives, as well as its mishandling by the Washoe County D.A., Richard A. Gammick and his County Office(rs), that even her representative was dripping with sympathy for Mrs. Lekas' precarious position, but nonetheless, honestly and impartially representing his client(s) to the best of his ability in the "Best Interests of Justice" and stating the importance of continuing this case. The importance to all... So much so, that Mrs. Lekas and all of Nevada benefitted by his conduct and the nobility of his arguments, i.e., that this matter had not gone so far that Mrs. Lekas' Civil Rights had been violated ~ to the point that she could not garner a fair trial ~ that misconduct conducted and committed by Washoe County CPS and its "hired gun" D.A. couldn't be overturned by good conduct from the State, the latter of which was ultimately demonstrated during this hearing; and that Mrs. Lekas had Civil remedies that were more appropriate at this time, rather than the more expedient, albeit, potentially proper, Dismissal for Prosecutorial Misconduct. From this newspaper's standpoint, the issue could have been addressed by a "Dismissal Without Prejudice," that would allow the State to refile and conduct the trial just the same. In terms of "Just the Same," this newspaper feels this Judgement was one step better than what the newspaper would have offered were it "The Judge." The State would not be subject to unreasonable expense and tribulation. The Taxpayer would not bear wanton costs. Mrs. Lekas would receive her day in Court with all sides sympathetic to her predicament. That's why you never "Second Guess a Judge," especially before the hearing or trial. The Court offered substantial support of Mrs. Lekas in terms of honoring her Civil Rights, which have been severely violated, and a form of "Silent Sanction" in which the Court sanctions or punishes the State (their Client, Washoe County, in this case, as the State has done no wrong like Washoe County has...Ed.), without the imposition just yet, or prematurely, of an actual sanction, not to mention, the opportunity to have the ultimate day in Court and prevail on the issues of the case. And the Judge can always sanction once the case has been heard, anyway. To be found "Not Guilty" once and for all time, by a Court that cannot help but see via the misconduct of the opposing side (Washoe County), not to mention, just how badly their case is by being seen in the bad light, since the County have placed themselves in that position by repeatedly and continually violating their own Laws and Rules of Professional Conduct... ...all this in order to "C-Y-A" and protect themselves and their worthless careers, by arguing the bad position, fighting the bad fight, and attempting to prevail at the expense of the innocent. Mrs. Lekas, in this particular case, though her case has now opened the doors for the reporting of others, if they will merely come forth. Or, to put it bluntly, to avoid having to admit that they, the: "Omnipotent-Washoe-County-S-S and C-P-S" were and still are, just, plain "W-R-O-N-G." Lord knows, they just hate it when they have to do that! <g> Stover strolled through the Courtroom as though a Knight at Camelot, sans only the legendary "Round Table" of King Arthur's Day, his armor a warm, two-piece business suit and tie, arguing "Nobler Deeds" in the King's Court with a fellow Knight, appropriately wearing black representing the armor worn by the noble antagonist, and the King listening intently to opposite sides of the arguments that were made. Chivalry was present at all times. No voice raised in anger, each voice raised only in concern, whether stating facts or questions. Each man honestly and imparitally arguing his case for his respective client, though Stover did stray appropriately with an emotional gaze of astonisment, anger and or despair for his client, from time-to-time. The King, ultimately making a decision that for now, would prove mildly unpopular, but in the long run, may allow Mrs. Lekas the foundation for ultimate Justice for the crimes committed against her by individuals acting like mere "Peons," not Noblemen and Noblewomen, should the King find his ward "Not Guilty" and the process for restitution initiated as a direct result. State and County know that Mrs. Lekas's case, if proven, is worth millions to her and her affected family, in terms of restitution, for all the abuses their subordinates have committed. Not to mention, the perpetrators of these crimes, though Public Servants and County workers, have served only themselves and their lust for power, and will shortly be facing prison time for their dishonorable conduct in the name of the State, County and People. Attorney Ken Stover knows all this, too, as does D.A. Richard A. Gammick, already under fire for the abuses of one of his subordinates ~ Jay Mannlein ~ who, rather apparently, are attempting collectively, to evade Justice in terms of these issues. That he, Mannlein, is alleged to have verbally threatened female co-workers with physical violence while working in Gammick's office, responsible to the D.A. and vice versa, and is the very person who compromised the D.A.'s Office in Karen Lekas' case. What are the odds of that happening? Extremely high when there is Pagan corruption in the ranks of an Army of Soldier-Worker-Crusaders. Yes, indeed, the writing is on the Wall, and no matter how many innocent (persecuted) or guilty Community Service workers the County has on its rolls, there are not enough to clean off the Grafitti left by the vandalism of Washoe County's own, entrusted, "elite," the latter term an emination from the mouths of the now, proverbial expression: "Legends in their own Minds." Which is to say, through their own misconduct and misdeeds, a handful of Social Workers belonging to Washoe County ~ the County subsequently and ultimately in their control ~ have spray-painted the Wall themselves in the manner of scrapping alley cats, not with the Nobility known of True Lions of Social Services elsewhere. To paraphrase Sir Winston Churchill from another Battle, in a reversal of fortune suffered by noble warriors, and as for the misconduct of the "Few:" "SoMany" other good, Washoe County Social Worker Lions suffer the embarassment that should only be received by "The Few," garbage-purveying alley cats operating in dark corridors while struggling with their own brand of "heat." Though the State Attorney General prevailed on his arguments, Civil Remedies are and were already planned against Washoe County SS, CPS and others. Stover's Motion sought recognition of the problems and succeeded on its merits alone. Nonetheless, in issuing his silent sanction and providing Karen Lekas with the funding to pursue evidence and testimony that will acquit her, the Judge provided an alternative solution to Dismissal, transitioning from King Arthur's kindness to King Solomon's wisdom, so that Attorney Ken Stover can now move forward to ensure that Karen Lekas' Civil Rights are now assured by the same Law prosecuting, giving Lekas a strong chance at recovering her name in a Jury Trial that was set for March 1, 2010, at this hearing of the Motion to Dismiss. As was pointed out in Court, Mrs. Lekas' Unemployment funds, like others in this nation, are faced with cut-off and with no source of Employment or Income, Lekas could find herself "Homeless," which would further complicate, if not compromise, the continued custody of her children, thus serving the efforts of Washoe County to defeat her. President Barrack Obama is attempting to extend Unemployment benefits to the jobless across the land and Attorney Stover has indicated to Lekas that he anticipates approval of the measure. Therefore, Stover informed the Court that at present, Lekas can afford him. In the interim, the Court has made the offer to appoint Stover as "Court-appointed Counsel" for Lekas should those benefits not be approved. Since she is blacklisted by the County effort, Lekas searches for other employment here in Washoe County. The offerings to a person faced with Felony charges, regardless of interest, are few and the choices fewer. Such is the life of this Single Mother of four, forced to Divorce by the unprincipled at Washoe County Social Services. And hers, as we have recently learned, is not the only relationship attacked and divided by Washoe County Social Service politics and power. Stay tuned to Silver State News Service for more news about this case and others in the coming days... |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ "Fish or Cut Bait!" ~~~~~~~~~~ Attorney Ken Stover converses with his client Karen Lekas across from the Mills Lane Justice Center this morning, in Reno, Nevada. Stover and Lekas were in Court this morning seeking dismissal of charges against her in the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas, where she is falsely accused of giving alcohol to a minor, her step-daughter. The Judge in the case, the Honorable Patrick Flanagan, Washoe County District Court Judge, Department 7, told Prosecutors this morning to "Fish or Cut Bait," meaning, to either appoint a Special Prosecutor and aggressively prosecute their case, or face dismissal for failure to prosecute. The Judge, whom is quadriplegic following a 2001 bicycle accident, and whom has a substantial record of community service outside of the Court room, also has the option to appoint the Special Prosecutor himself and told Karen Lekas directly that, in regards to his giving the Prosecution one final chance, "...this case is very important for the People and to you." To be clear, a "Not Guilty" verdict holds tremendous weight in the final determination of such charges, or whether charges can be brought again, versus dismissal based on Prosecutor's failures or mere technicalities. However, in conversations with SSNS, Karen Lekas has made it clear that she and her family have suffered for 18 months and she wants this case over. Just the same, her Attorney instructed her today to begin obtaining the funds to retain a Civil Attorney to litigate Washoe County CPS over their misconduct. SSNS believes that Washoe County SS / CPS are wanting to prosecute Karen Lekas at this point due to open hostility against her, knowing that she has a good case against them and that such a case would expose them to the "Bad Light" of Public Scrutiny. If Lekas' case gets exposed, then an Audit of Washoe County SS / CPS becomes possible and other cases of abuse by Washoe County SS / CPS can be outlined and exposed in the process. "Fear" has been one of the primary tactics alleged against Washoe County SS /CPS in their operations, along with False Allegations, Malicious Prosecution and Fraudulent Convictions as a result. The Editor has now been informed of threats made by Washoe County against both himself and his publication as a result of his publishing. The threats involve False Allegations to be made against him and Malicous Prosecution for the purpose of Fraudulent Conviction. The individual receiving those threats informs us that they were told to "shut the website down." FYI: the subjects of our investigations don't have that power. No Law and No Threat shall be created to abridge the Right of Freedom of the Press here at this publication. No threats will be accepted. At present, Silver State News has two other cases waiting in the wings in addition to the Lekas-Sharra cases, and this Editor knows that more exist and he believes "they" will come forward. And though the Editor had to drop two cases due to the conduct of the subjects of our investigations not being "above board," the Editor still feels that both cases had merit in their arguments. Those cases involved Kimberly Blackwood and Washoe County SS, and Julia French and Washoe County / State of Nevada, as well as the Atlantis Hotel and Casino. Photo: M. Daniels / ILIPS Group International |
| "OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am in the very same nightmare. I would love to speak with you and kim please email me" ~ Karen Lekas |
| New Case Materials to Be Added Shortly to the Cases Listed Below: |
| Breaking
News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back! Files Motion to Dissolve Extended Restraining Order with Court Demands Equal Protection Under the Law (Fourteenth Amendment) and her First Amendment Right to Free Press. Cites that if a Newspaper has a Right to Publish under the First Amendment, then a Victim has the Right to take her Story to a Newspaper Editor. The First Amendment Guarantees the Right of the Public to Know and as a Direct Result, the Right of the Public to a Free Press and to take their stories to the Press. The First Amendment also guarantees Karen Lekas' Right to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances and her Right to Freedom of Conscience (Religion) and Speech. Why is Washoe County still not listening!!?? |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back Karen Lekas Mawhorter applies for "Dissolution of Order for Protection Against Stalking, Aggravated Stalking or Harassment," in regards to Michelle Hill's separate application for a T.R.O. Hill filed one on her behalf and one on her husband's, when only one document was necessary. Both documents were in Michelle Hill's handwriting, except for the signature on Randy Hill's document. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back A minor mistake on line 12 which has been pointed out to Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter for correction with the Court. The line reads "I did nothing legal" and should read "I did nothing illegal." This occasionally happens and will be something she'll laugh about later, but for now, it'll be rather irritating to her. What is important about that paragraph is this: "Mark Daniels under oath in court vocalized that I have no control over his publication." This is absolutely correct. I make all the decisions as to what documents get published and despite what the Hills had to say, which included perjury, lies by omission and a twisting of the facts. Then there were the points that could not be denied, particularly the publication of photos by Mrs. Hill herself, on an open Facebook site, playing beer pong and "teaching" others how to play it, including Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's eldest son and his underage 17-year-old girlfriend (the Hills in Court claimed her parents were present and standing behind the two, out of the picture...), without regard for the fact that allegations of Alcohol abuse in the Lekas Mawhorter home was among the grounds for removal of children there. As Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter says: "I am not and never was harassing the Hills. I am a Mother protecting her children. I did nothing "illegal." I pray relief from this court." In lines 7 thru 8, threats made by Washoe County against both Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter and Silver State News are included in this Public Record document by Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter. Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter indicates that this action is Washoe County SS carrying out their threats. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back The infamous Beer Pong photo as posted by Michelle Hill. Mrs. Hill playing beer pong in front of Ryan Saladino, Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's eldest son and his then, under-aged, 17-year-old girlfriend. Mr. and Mrs. Hill claimed in Court that the girl's parents were present and standing behind them, out of the picture. SSNS is uncertain as to what their point is since she's still a minor. More important is the fact that Washoe County Social Services placed Ryan's younger brother in the home and he is a minor as well, despite the fact they had Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter arrested on false allegations that she had given alcohol to her husband's four-year-old daughter. Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter wasn't even home at the time of the incident, had to be called home to take the child to the doctor, where it was learned the child had ingested alcohol from a then, unknown source. Soda cans with alcohol in them, believed the possession of the eldest son Ryan, were later found in the boys' bedroom. As a result of this photo and the complaint filed by Criminal Attorney Ken Stover, on Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's behalf, her second eldest son, Stetson, was removed from the Hills' home. In subsequent meetings with Washoe County SS, Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter has learned of the application of a Double Standard by Washoe County in that, the Hills still have their children, as do the parents of the minor involved (Ryan's girlfriend), and no criminal charges are filed against them, while Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter fights for her freedom and Civil Rights against false charges of giving alcohol to a minor. During one of those meetings, Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter brought up the issue that the Hills have a refrigerator that is essentially a "beer keg," and Washoe County Social Worker Emily Smith allegedly responded that she thought it was "cool." |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back Today's filing seeking dissolution of the Extended Restraining Order against Karen Lekas sought by Randy Hill, as filed by Karen Lekas Mawhorter today. The Court and the Hills acknowledge this Editor's Right to Free Press ~ why not Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's Right to Free Press in approaching a reporter with her story, which has been confirmed as valid. This Editor contacted Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter and instructed her to contact her Attorney with the photos. Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's Attorney Ken Stover, a Criminal Attorney, filed the complaint against the Hills with Washoe County CPS. How is it that a confirmed complaint, which resulted in Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's son Stetson being removed from the Foster Parent's home, results in a Temporary, and now, an Extended Restraining Order against the complainant. As Stover is an Officer of the Court, and verified the complaint, there is no stalking, aggravated stalking nor harassment. Just a valid, verified complaint, that the County has been forced to act upon, after not acting upon Mrs. Lekas Mawhorter's complaints ~ including a complaint to Police ~ in the past!? |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Karen Lekas Fights Back Lines 14 ~ 15 "I too, have First Amendment Rights to Free Press and in exercising those rights, to speak with a reporter about my case and story. I believe my Constitutional rights have been violated with the granting of this extension. I did believe my children to be in an alcohol culture in the Hills' home. I don't believe the Hills have any business having contact with my children due to the poor judgement, the bad example they set in teaching 'Drinking Games,' and in having an alcohol culture in their home." Lines 20 ~ 21 "I respectfully request the order against me be dissolved. The Judge's decision is illogical. If Mr. Daniels' First Amendment Right to Publish are obviously upheld by the Court and the Hills, then my First Amendment Right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Press in approaching a reporter with my story, is absolute and protected by the U.S. Constitution." ~~~~~~~~~~ Due Process, Equal Protection, Equal Justice Under the Law Due Process: "Due
process (more fully due process of law) is the principle
that the government must respect all of the legal rights
that are owed to a person according to the law. Due
process holds the government subservient to the law of
the land, protecting individual persons from the state. The Fourteenth Amendment (Equal Protection Clause): Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." ~ Wikipedia.Org |
| State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ The Long and Winding Road... ~~~~~~~~~~ The Frustrations of a Mother attempting to regain custody of her son from a System of Hate designed not for the Best Interests of the Child, but to "Make Things Personal" and destroy lives and families in the process. What it is to be the "Accused" walking that "Long and Winding Road" of the Washoe County SS ~ one strewn deliberately with broken glass ~ and you're forced to walk it alone, like a Gauntlet, in your bare feet. There is no Justice for the accused, especially when the presumption is not one of innocence, as our Laws supposedly espouse, but rather the reality that you're "Guilty" until you prove yourself innocent while walking atop broken glass, cut and bleeding, while everyone in the System is striking out at you from all sides and every direction. And in the midst of this, you must look inward, reflectively, and criticize yourself in the manner of being your own "worst critic." Cruel and Unusual punishment is always a slow, tedious, inhumance, wanton and ultimately, degrading process. A million words will be published on the front page about your alleged guilt, but the day that you prove your innocent, you will receive only a small blurb on the back of Section D. If you're "Lucky..." ~~~~~~~~~~ Trapped and in Distress in a Bottomless Pit: From: "Karen Lekas" No Rescue in Sight *: * No Fault of White ~ it's "The System" ~ Ed.
~~~~~~~~~~ One can only hope that a risk will be taken and that One Gallant Rush * by your rescuers will set you free... ~~~~~~~~~~ "The iron gate of our prison stands half open, one gallant rush... ...will fling it wide." ~ Frederick Dougless |
![]() On Motherhood... "In the sheltered simplicity of the first days after a baby is born... Photo: M. Daniels / ILIPS Group International |
![]() On Motherhood... ...one sees again the magical closed circle... Photo: M. Daniels / ILIPS Group International |
![]() On Motherhood... ...the
miraculous sense of two people existing only for each
other." Photo: M. Daniels / ILIPS Group International |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Silver State News Service Responds to WCSS Director Kevin Schiller Greetings Mr.
Schiller: ~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:09:35
-0700 (PDT) |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Karen Lekas' Message to Kevin Schiller ~~~~~~~~~~ Schiller Gets A Second Chance From Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ "You have the power to make a great difference. I hope you use your power to help." ~
Karen Lekas in her e-mail to Kevin Schiller, ~~~~~~~~~~ From:
Karen Lekas |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Statement of Karen Lekas' Mother Regarding Allegations by Washoe County SS and Alcohol Culture at Foster Parents' Home ~~~~~~~~~~ "I
Blanca Rosalinda Cameron am writting this letter with the
assistance of my daughter Sara Hill. This is her e-mail
address and computer. I do not have access to any other
computer and do not have an e-mail account. |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Silver State News Service Responds to WCSS Director Kevin Schiller ~~~~~~~~~~ Schiller's Earlier Message: From:
"Schiller, Kevin" < KSchiller@washoecounty.us > |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Silver State News Service Responds to WCSS Director Kevin Schiller ~~~~~~~~~~ Lekas Response to Schiller's Message: From:
Karen Lekas |
| Breaking
News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels We have more on the story behind these TRO's. They are an attempt to subvert the First Amendment, but they are so much more. To include perjury, so we're going to have some fun on the 17th in Justice of the Peace Court for the Reno Township ~ a Washoe County Court, not a Reno City Court ~ and in the meantime, here are Michelle and Randy Hill's Public Record statements about why the First Amendment should be suspended: |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Page 1 of 4 of Michelle Hill's statement to the Washoe County Sheriff. Emily Smith and Washoe County are implicated immediately in Hill's statement. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Page 2 of 4 of Michelle Hill's statement to the Washoe County Sheriff. In regards to publishing of their "personal" information, this statement and the document she provided in support are taken seriously out of context and result in Perjury due to "Act of Omission" and "Lie by Omission." |
| MISSING
DOCUMENT Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Page 3 of 4 of Michelle Hill's statement to the Washoe County Sheriff is Missing from both T.RO.s and was not on file with the Reno Justice Court Clerk, Civil Division. We will be attempting to obtain a copy from the Sheriff today. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Page 4 of 4 of Michelle Hill's statement to the Washoe County Sheriff which contains a seriously false statement in regards to harassment by Karen Lekas on a "weekly," if not "daily" basis. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels "Stalking, Aggravated Stalking or Harassment." SEE Also: "Without Lawful Authority." SEE Also: "The First Amendment, U.S. Constitution (Law), Bill of Rights (Also Law)." SEE Also: "The Public's Right to Know." And all she had to do was fill out one of these ~ she fills out two, then two more for Karen Lekas, and the poor Court Clerks have their work quadrupled in the process. Oh, well. And everybody wonders why the system works so slow! It's not the Clerks' fault! |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Washoe County Social Services' "Emily Smith" ~ Tattletale! <g> We thank you for implicating yourself and the Washoe County SS in this matter. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels We have no Confidentiality agreement with the Hills. Due to the alcohol culture in the Hills' home, we fear for them and their children, too. We also fear for other children and families they may come into contact with, whether they are children riding with the Hills in their large Recreational Vehicle, or those they may come into contact with in the opposite lane of traffic. I have not been asked by anyone to remove any information about this case. That is Perjury on the Hills' part. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Washoe County Sheriff informed. We have had no contact from them here at SSNS. Neither has Ms. Lekas. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels People who do no wrong have nothing to fear. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels They still have contact with 2 of Karen's children despite the fact that one has been taken from their home based on charges filed by a Criminal Attorney due to information relayed by this Editor to Karen Lekas with specific instructions to contact and inform her Attorney, along with the transmittal of photos to the same. She followed our instructions; the Criminal Attorney filed the complaint; Stetson Lekas was removed from their homes by Washoe County SS and for good cause, in this Editor's opinion. This issue, of course, omitted from their statements. I am restricted from Confidential sites. So, just how many Beer Pong Festivals are there in Reno!? I know the Cal Neva has one. Well, there goes my .99 cent breakfast! Just the same, this is very funny to me... ...readers, can you figure out why!? <g> Send your responses to: |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels I am restrained from Confidential sites. DAMN! And I was on the verge of discovering the Truth about Area 51! CURSES! FOILED AGAIN! |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels And "Perjury" is the charge you'll be faced with, along with your husband, Mrs. Hill. You're going to have no one to blame for that but yourselves. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Wasting taxpayers' dollars. All she needed was to check the other block and fill out one report. She quadrupled the work of the Court Clerk filing on behalf of herself and her husband, when all she had to do was include her husband's name on her document. And yes, Randy didn't fill this out, Michelle did. Her handwriting is a match on both her and her husband's documents. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels 300 Pages!? Man I've been busy! We're going to do a count...whoops! All done... Two pages... |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels I have had no communications with or from the Hills, therefore this statement is Perjury. I have not been asked by anyone to take these materials down. SSNS has no "confidentiality" clause with the Hills. As the Washoe County School District released their information, their complaint is with Washoe County, not with Silver State News. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Mention of the Washoe County Sheriff's Report Number. To date, the Sheriff has not contacted either Ms. Lekas or myself. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels "...we fear retaliation could occur on our family." By whom? And if you didn't do anything wrong, then what are you afraid of? Mr. and Mrs. Hill fail to mention their wrongdoing. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels The Editor is restrained from Confidential sites. Whoop-tee-do! |
![]() Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Follow-up To: Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels We're not even sure that Randy Hill signed this. As for attempting to utilize a T.R.O. or Justice of the Peace Court to trump the First Amendment, we've already stopped Dannie G. Serfoss Jr. and the Serfoss Crime Family from doing that. We expect little problem in defeating this non-sensical effort to obstruct justice by having a Justice of the Peace Court suspend Federal Civil Rights. "...and no new information to be posted to this and any site." The Los Angeles Times, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal are going to be very disappointed if this T.R.O. is approved! |
| Breaking
News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Temporary Restraining Orders Issued Against Karen Lekas, SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Vague Charges alleging either Stalking, Aggravated Stalking and/or Harassment are denied by both Lekas and Daniels. Public Record documents in Daniels' case are presented here (below). Discrepancies with documents noted, to include Improper Service. Method of Service may have resulted in a crime. Hearing set for September 17, 2009. Lekas to file Court documents by tomorrow. Details of charges not outlined in document. "Good Cause" must be shown to a Judge before T.R.O.s can be issued. Washoe County involvement indicated therefore, Lawsuits pending. The Editor has never met the complainants whom are the former Foster Parents of Stetson Lekas, the latter of whom was removed from their home due to complaints filed by Criminal Attorney Ken Stover on evidence discovered by the Editor on the internet. Karen Lekas has indeed been harassed by the complainants before, filed Police complaints and also filed complaints against the complainants with Washoe County Social Services and Kevin Schiller. Schiller has still not responded to Ms. Lekas' communications. Schiller's response to SSNS' inquiries has simply been for us to send their clients back to the Washoe County SS, apparently so that they in the SS can quash dissent. Washoe County SS has indicated that Karen Lekas has never complained before about the Foster Parents. We have the documentation that says "Loud & Clear..." ...oh Yes, she did! Looks to be another case of a County and its "friends" attempting to trump the First Amendment with a Justice of the Peace Court and a T.R.O. based on lies and misconceptions. See "Daniels vs Serfoss Jr." to see how the last attempted ended in unmitigated defeat for the Plaintiffs, Dannie G. Serfoss Jr., Joan Lee Serfoss and Vicki Brown (Serfoss). Judge Harold Albright of Department 4 apparently issued the Order. Judge Pete Sferazza will apparently hear the case on September 17, 2009, though we may petition the Court for an earlier date and as to the "substance" of the charges. |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Michelle Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Michelle Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Michelle Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Michelle Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Randy Keith Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Randy Keith Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Randy Keith Hill vs M. Daniels |
![]() Breaking News Alert! Randy Keith Hill vs M. Daniels |
| State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Department
of Social Services ~~~~~~~~~~ Washoe County SS Responds From: Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Department
of Social Services ~~~~~~~~~~ Unresponsive Washoe County SS This Just Received From Karen Lekas, Defendant in State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas, which meets again for a status hearing this Friday at 9:00 a.m., at Washoe County Court in Reno, Nevada, across from the Mills Lane Justice Center. ~ Ed ~~~~~~~~~~ Here's what I sent Emily, we knew
she wasnt going to reply to my request but I am not just
going away. "I am here to remind you..." |
| Breaking News Alert! State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ "Fish or Cut Bait!" ~~~~~~~~~~ The Judge in the Case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas gives the System "one more chance to work!" One final extension of time has been granted to the District Attorney and the Attorney General in the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas to prosecute a case or it is indicated the case will be dismissed by the Judge. Judge Patrick Flanagan, known for his integrity and concern for both the Law and the People, made it very clear that if the issue of a Special Prosecutor was not resolved by the Court's next meeting on August 25, 2009, that he would decide matters at that time. The Judge's exact statement to the Prosecutors was: "Fish or Cut Bait!" The Judge explained to Karen Lekas, present in the Court with her dynamic Attorney Ken Stover, who fought for dismissal today, that "this case is very important to the People and to you," indicating that he wanted to "give the system one more chance to work." Stover, who is a no nonsense brawler in the Courtroom and a true Tiger for his clients, held up a box of information prepared for the Attorney General that contained four notebooks full of documents, and one additional document of two reams, approximately 500 - 600 pages, that the Attorney General or a Special Prosecutor now has ten days in which to review prior to the next Court hearing. Stover challenged whether or not any Attorney could review that much material and come to a decision ~ prosecute or dismiss ~ in that time frame. The Judge indicated that he appreciated Stover's position, but the importance of the case weighed heavily on his mind in making this determination to give the opposing side one last chance to prosecute their case. The recommended Special Prosecutor did appear in the Court for the hearing, as did one other individual, who conversed quietly with Stover and Lekas while Court was in session. The case could be dismissed by the State Attorney General by the next Court date, or a Special Prosecutor might be appointed from either the State Attorney General's Office or the Court, or it might be dismissed altogether by the Judge. At present, three of Lekas' children are indicating coaching by the Washoe County Social Services/CPS, and the eldest of those children only learned this week that the reason Washoe County SS had for holding him was the fact they wanted him to testify against his mother. SSNS has also learned that Washoe County SS has apparently been allowing the former Foster Parents, from whom Stetson was taken, to have visitation with him despite the fact that family had involved him in an "Alcohol Culture." Photos of the family playing Beer Pong with his now adult, 20-year-old brother Ryan, were published by no less than the Foster Mother, Michelle Hill, 26, of Reno, Nevada, on Facebook.Com, where this Editor stumbled across them and reported them to the Mother with instructions that she take them immediately to her Attorney. These instructions were a requirement that if not met by Karen Lekas, would have resulted in our having to drop her case. Certain knowledge of Child Neglect and/or Child Endangerment is required by this publication to be reported to authorities by the subjects of our stories. In addition to the "Beer Pong" photos, semi-nude photos of the Foster Mother receiving a tattoo were also published by her on Facebook.Com, raising serious questions as to the welfare of the children in this Editor's eyes, particularly since the children had been removed from the home based on False allegations against the Mother of giving alcohol to the daughter of her former husband. Needless to say, this Publication and its Editor are shocked to learn that visitation between the former Foster Parents and Karen Lekas' son is actually being encouraged, let alone, permitted, by the Washoe County SS. Ken Stover contacted an individual tentetively identified as Michelle Rosencrantz of Washoe County SS, to inform her that a complaint against Washoe County SS for Child Neglect was being filed by him, a Criminal Attorney and Officer of the Court. Also, while present with Stover and his client Lekas today after Court for the case status hearing, Stover instructed his client in our presence to begin obtaining the funds for retaining a second Attorney to being Civil Lawsuits against Washoe County CPS. Karen Lekas did confide that it will be difficult to find a source for those funds, considering the War that has been conducted on her and her former husband, David Sharra, by Washoe County CPS, which not only alleges the Felony Child Endangerment charges against Lekas ~ who has an alibi in the case and evidence supporting her innocence beyond the alibi ~ but has alleged charges of Sexual Abuse of Lekas' daughter by David Sharra. Both Lekas and Sharra deny the charges and the child has complained to her Mother, in earshot of a Washoe County representative who is supportive of Lekas' case, that Washoe County SS "hounded" her into telling them what they want to hear and that Sharra "never touched me in that way." The timing of the charges appears orchestrated to "Divide and Conquor" Lekas and Sharra by destroying their credibility and interfering with their income earning abilities through these heinous and allegedly false, fraudulent and malicious charges. Silver State News has seen substantial evidence so far of both Lekas' and Sharra's innocence. While we are still in the process of obtaining and reviewing more information, to include planned communications with her former husband, Travis Lekas, which have been delayed by workload and the Editor's ongoing illness and injury, we believe that both have been forthcoming with the Truth and that criminal misconduct within the D.A.'s and the Washoe County SS offices are the only thing maintaining the "lives" of these cases at this time, to include the physical menacing and threatening of at least one of Lekas' children. Attorney Stover is on the attack against the D.A.'s Office for alleged criminal misconduct, which include D.A. representative Jay Mannlein attempting to discuss the case with Lekas without her Attorney present; issues of Entrapment; the issues involving Washoe County SS worker Michelle Rosencrantz providing sealed, Privacy Protected records to Sharra's ex-wife to use against him in a Child Custody case, those records coming from Karen Lekas' case; the alleged menacing and threatening of at least one of Karen Lekas' children; the Child Neglect incident involving the "Alcohol Culture" of the Foster Parents; the failure of the Washoe County SS workers to respond to complaints filed against Rosencrantz and the Foster Parents by Karen Lekas and David Sharra; the failure of Washoe County SS directors to meet with Karen Lekas in regards to their complaints despite "solicitation" from those same directors to meet as reported by said Directors to Silver State News Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels and published here; and allegations of Tampering with Witnesses, Threatening Witnesses and Obstruction of Justice, in regards to the Lekas children reporting that Social Services are coaching them as to what to say to Judges. In one such attempt by Washoe County SS and CPS, the child that was threatened rebelled against his captors, calling them "liars" and echoing his complaints of coaching to Court Master Buffy Jo Dreiling ~ on the record ~ in a Family Law Court in his Juvenile Case. This is not the only case that Silver State News is following in regards to Washoe County abuses against Low Income, Middle Class and Indigent Parents, to include Human Trafficking in the same for profit. In speaking with Attorney Stover, a man this publication is watching with great interest and for our potential endorsement in regards to a possible run for the District Attorney's seat in the next election, SSNS has learned that Law Enforcement in the local community continues its march against Civil Rights with increased numbers of infractions involving Miranda failures, coerced confessions, false arrests and malicious prosecutions. SSNS Editor Daniels and Stover exchanged information in regards to these infractions, and also in regards to Daniels' recent second "Citizen's Arrest" at Stead, Nevada, on false Misdemeanor Trespass charges, and how a conspiracy is afoot among Washoe County Courts and Law Enforcement to undermine the Civil Rights of the accused in Northern Nevada, to include Reno and the Washoe County area, in particular. SSNS will be interviewing Attorney Stover shortly in regards to his views on the Lekas Case, criminal misconduct within the Office of District Attorney Dick Gammick, the failure of Gammick's Office to prosecute or successfully prosecute in several specific and important cases, Civil Rights in general under the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, and what in general, is wrong with the Law today and its impact on families trying to scratch out a living in Northern Nevada's Washoe County. SSNS expects to have more Breaking News in regards to the Karen Lekas case, possibly as early as tonight, so stay tuned for Nevada's most controversial online news publication for events of the day as they happen. |
| State
of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Standby for Breaking News, Tomorrow, in the Karen Lekas Case! Update: See Breaking News Alert Above... ~~~~~~~~~~ Down to the Wire ~~~~~~~~~~ D.A. Representatives Interfering in Lekas Case Despite D.A. Gammick Disqualifying Himself ~~~~~~~~~~ Status Hearing Friday, 9:00 a.m. Attorney Stover expected to file against D.A.'s Office in regards to continued attempts to harass Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ Attorney General Reportedly Appalled by County Misconduct in Case ~~~~~~~~~~ The Jig May Be Up For Washoe County ~~~~~~~~~~ SSNS Believe False Charges Against Lekas Should Be and Will Be Dismissed Tomorrow ~~~~~~~~~~ Attorney Ken Stover Expected to Outline Lekas' Civil Case Against State, County Shortly... ~~~~~~~~~~ Stover Filing Complaint in Regards to Child Neglect in Foster Parents Beer Pong Incident ~~~~~~~~~~ NO Washoe County Social Services !!! SSNS Will Not Halt Its Legitimate, First Amendment Protected Reporting !!! ~~~~~~~~~~ Washoe County SS: Stop Threatening Karen Lekas and her Children! If You've Got a Gripe with SSNS and its Editor, Bring on your Charges Against Us or Write a Letter to the Editor... ...Just Like Everyone Else! ~~~~~~~~~~ The Time is Now for the Washoe Gestapo to Stop Picking on Women and Children!!! |
| State
of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Standby for Breaking News, Tomorrow, in the Karen Lekas Case! ~~~~~~~~~~ Letter to Emily ~~~~~~~~~~ Karen Lekas follows up on the recent case status hearing with Emily Smith and the Washoe County SS: From:
Karen Lekas <~~~~~~~~~~~@yahoo.com> |
| Editor's
Choice The Question of Romanticizing of Drinking Games to Our Youth... "Every Saturday, $10.00, two pitchers of beer, Signup 9:00, Play 10:00 Beer Pong is a game of skill, patience and Beer. Here at Club Cal Neva, we know a lot about beer. In Americas drinkingest city... " ~ Cal Neva "America's Drinkingest City" From the same folks who brought you "Bikini Jello Wrestling" ~~~~~~~~~~ "Trust me ~ stick to Jello..." ~ Ed. ~~~~~~~~~~ Beer Pong Tournament Ad from the Club Cal Neva Link Takes You To You Tube 1) Please note other Beer Pong Videos 2) Please note that nothing is said about how you get to the Club Cal Neva nor how you get home, especially if you're the loser of a Beer Pong Tourney 3) Please note lack of disclaimer about drinking responsibly 4) Please note lack of disclaimer about "Don't Try This At Home" 5) Please note lack of disclaimer about "Don't Try This Anywhere If You're A Washoe County Social Services Foster Parent 'Caring' for Children Taken From A Home Accused of Giving Alcohol to Children..." 6) Please note that the Rules of the Game are not clearly explained, particularly the purpose 7) Please note no mention of utilizing a Designated Driver nor of the Event Operator offering rides home if you've had too much. 8) Please note Equal Opportunity Message ~ "Ladies Should Play Beer Pong" ~ Tell That One to Princess Di of England (Lady Diana Spencer) and all her closest (dead) friends, to include her bodyguard driver. 9) Please note use of Hip Hop and Alternative Music aimed at today's Youth. That wasn't exactly Glenn Miller's "Moonlight Serenade" they were playing for Granny and Grandpa Barfly. 10) Please note that your kids can visit You Tube at anytime, that "The Internet is not your Babysitter," and that You Tube does not segregate Adult Drinking Games from its online programming into sections that small children in their Tender Years and Teens cannot access. ~~~~~~~~~~ Hasn't anyone ever heard of "Decaf Starbuck's Pong," where the purpose of the game is to make the other guy "awake and aware" as to what is going in promoting Drinking Games to Youth and send the message not to drive while on excessive amounts of Caffine? The Nevada State Troopers determine the Kings and Queens of Sobriety by not pulling them over to arrest them for DWI * / DWAI ** The Real losers get their bodies covered out on Interstate 80, Highway 395 or at some intersection in a local town, with brightly colored yellow sheets. You know ~ the victims of a head on crash with someone else who just came from a Drinking Game and the opposing or crossing lane of traffic... ~~~~~~~~~~ In Memorium For SP4 Gary Maurius and SP4 Jorge Meaux 1/189th ATC Company (FWD) Schwaebisch Hall, FRG Cold War Volunteer Army Killed in the Line of Duty by a Drunk Driver ~~~~~~~~~~ * DWI ~ "Driving While Impaired" (Alchohol Related) ** DWAI ~ Driving While Ability Impaired" (Sleep issues, Medicines, Medical Reasons, Non-alcohol related issues) |
| Welcome
Washoe County SS We are now informed of new readers at the Department of Social Services, Washoe County. We would like to welcome you all onboard. The good news is, if you don't like what you read, you can cancel your subscription and we'll give you your money back. The bad news is, we're a "Free Press with a mind of our own." A Free Press also in the literal sense, therefore, subscriptions are free. I am the Santa Claus of online publishing. I know when you've been good. I know when you've been bad. At Washoe County SS ~ not all of your are guilty! More good news: I only go after the guilty! More bad news: Whether or not you appear guilty is based not on what I write, but the conduct of your fellow Social Workers in the Washoe County Health and Human Services system. If you feel I treat you harshly here, you might want to check on what your fellow SS workers have been wrongly and/or unlawfully doing in all your names. Legitimate complaints from the inside help those with legitimate complaints on the outside. Together, caring Social Workers and caring Parents ~ even the latter, answering to allegations against themselves in regards to their families ~ can join together to clean up the Washoe County SS and turn it back into "Washoe County Social Services." This publication and its Editor believe that movement is already underway. Even more bad news: Washoe County SS workers ~ and they know whom they are ~ trafficking in Children, the Indigent Parents and other, Low to Middle income Parents in general with allegations ~ false or otherwise ~ of Child Abuse against them. Worst possible news: Washoe County SS and Kid's Kottage alleged to have abused children physically and emotionally, as well as Child Endangerment, Child Neglect, and allowing and/or promoting Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Underaged Teenage Sex, within Washoe County SS, Kid's Kottage and/or by Foster Parents in their system. Adoption for Profit ~ How the Rich can buy your "cute" children on the mere whim of an allegation by the Washoe County SS and its unsocial Social Workers. The Smoking Gun and how that gun goes off at the heads of Indigent, Poor and Middle Class Parents. How the Mainstream Press aid and abett Child Trafficking, while at the same time, they are barred from inside knowledge of the Cases of the Children placed for Adoption by: The Washoe County $$ The "Aryan Brotherhood" of Child Trafficking The Gestapo ~ Alive and Well in Washoe County! ...and Making 21st Century "House Calls for Hitler" in America... ~~~~~~~~~~ Money ~ Power ~ Greed ~ Lust ~ Children as Chattel ~ Indentured Servitude ~ Slavery ~ Human Trafficking for Profit by the State of Nevada ~ Orwell's Big Brother Reincarnated ~ The Return of the Gestapo ~ Child Trafficking for Profit by the Washoe County SS: ~~~~~~~~~~ The 21st Century Social Worker in the State of Nevada... The Swastika Sisters ...of the Washoe County SS ...and the sinister reasons as to why they want your children! The Swastika Sisters ~ "Giving Social Workers a Schlecht Name! ~~~~~~~~~~ Washoe County The Land of Hate in America!!! |
| From
The Editor: 10:11 p.m., July 31, 2009 Truth... ...Who Needs the Truth From Journalists !?!? Perhaps this little ditty will answer the question for all... ~~~~~~~~~~ This publication has received word of a third-party complaint regarding the truthfulness of our publishing, i.e., a story in which the Editor discussed the Foster Parents of one of Karen Lekas' sons playing "Beer Pong" with that young man's brother, who is now of adult age, though his seventeen year-old girlfriend was not. The photo, which was found on the internet and forwarded by this Editor to Mrs. Lekas, specifically for her Attorney's knowledge and purusal, was found on the Foster Parent's website and entitled by her as "Beer Pong," along with some additional photos which I may discuss later. Which I may even publish for my readers to consider. Apparently Mrs. Lekas' son claims that only "water" was in the cups however, the picture was entitled "Beer Pong," so we must take the writer at her word. Either way, whoever is present, is being taught the consumption of mass quantities of alcohol, even if water is used, and we totally disagree with the young man's appraisal of the situation and/or why it represents a danger to himself and others like him. As Editor of this publication, being familiar with the popularity of drinking games around the World, and having "chug-a-lugged" a few of my own back in the day, I'm one that doesn't believe that people play "drinking games" with water unless you're in Guantanomo Bay, Cuba ~ the American side ~ and have some people in your presence that you want to question there, who just hours earlier, wanted to kill you and all Americans, and even if that were the case, as Editor , I don't approve of those types of games either. Waterboarding is torture ~ you don't do that to anyone, let alone, Prisoners of War whom are rendered by their captivity to be "Unarmed, Non-combatants." So, having digressed, I return to the subject at hand and, to put it very bluntly, I'm not taking a damned thing down! I'm not that gullible. I'm not that "stoopid." I wouldn't care if she was dressed as a Nun playing "Holy Water Pong!" She said "Beer!" "Beer" it is! End of THAT discussion! I publish what I know and/or believe to be true, and if anyone can show that I've received false information or have published a lie, I'm more than happy to print a retraction provided that I am satisfied that the information is proven false. I don't make it a habit to publish lies, unless they are someone elses and I'm about to disprove them. Otherwise, I don't have time for the damned things, especially when trying to get to the Truth is time-consuming enough! Anyone with such concerns i.e., that I am publishing lies and they can prove it, by God send your proof and comments to: publisher@ilips.net ...and I'll be more than happy to publish what you have and then respond appropriately. Feel free to write me and submit scans of your evidence. If you don't have a computer or a scanner, my snail mail address is: Mark S. "Bear"
Daniels Write me and send a Xerox copy of your evidence. I have published this message before. I will likely have to publish this again. And as for you, Karen's son, since I know tonight that you'll be reading this: I'm the one that stumbled across the photo. I'm the one that published the information. I'm the one that sent a copy to your Mother out of concern for you, and she in turn, upon my direction, forwarded it to her Attorney , and let it be known that I usually advise her to consult with him on anything I send her or publish. That may be in advance of, or after publication. Either way, the call is mine! That is a responsibility I have that not only comes with being a Publisher and an Editor ~ it comes with being a Man! Better yet, a Human Being... However, neither she nor you have control of my Press. And by Law and Ethics, we publish "The Truth, The Whole Truth and Nothing But The Truth," as the First Amendment not only allows us to do so, but supports "We Journalists" in our quest as members of the Press, to guarantee the "Public's Right to Know," per the First Amendment to the Constitution, also known as the first of the "Bill of Rights." That "responsibility," in my own opinion, supercedes my own First Amendment "Rights," which let me assure you, and despite how Law is practiced in reality here in Washoe County and the City of Reno, Nevada, are considerable. This publication has grave concerns about this entire situation with Washoe County Social Services, Kid's Kottage, Foster Parents whom are friends with and receive special treatment from the Washoe County SS, Foster Parents driving around in "Motorhomes loaded with Booze, High School Cheerleaders and others," and those innocent parents whom are falsely accused by the Washoe County SS, the latter of whom we are informed, believe and thereon allege, are... ...coaching children to disrespect their parents and bear false witness against the same. Or, in other words, coached to commit perjury under oath on a witness stand, and when that perjury is committed to, then comes the issue of "Subornation of Perjury." Along with the issue of "Violation of Civil Rights Under Color of Authority of Law !!! " Oh, but if the kids are scared and testify against their will to such things, then its not Subornation of Perjury as much as it is "Threatening" and "Tampering with Witnesses," which are far more serious crimes. Multiple victims guaranteed in those types of cases... All this so that the Washoe County SS can hold onto those same children ~ some whom are frightened of such authority, others with ulterior motives in attempting to use Washoe County SS to escape their homes "early," so as to "run amuck," and even do so rebelliously and lawlessly in the face of "Lawful" authority ~ and son, yours isn't the only case in which this publication has heard of and confirmed abuses by Social Workers and Foster Parents against Innocent Parents heading up families with children, either Patriarchal, Matriarchal or Single Parent of either sex. And why does the Washoe County SS want to hold onto other people's children these days? Well, one obvious reason is that there are actually abused children out there and "abused" Social Workers trying to help them. Tonight, I'm not dealing with those. It's the others, who have the following motives, few and far between as these types of abusive Social Workers are: 1) Money! Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars per child coming through the State to the County from the Federal Government, and there are something like 800+ children currently in the system, if those figures aren't under or over reported, depending on whom the abusive are talking to ~ The U.S. Treasury in terms of over reporting, the nosey Press on the other... and... 2) Power! What an aphrodesiac, this Power is, that you can have power and control over the lives of others you feel superior to, and can subordinate, based on whatever charges you can come up with, even if you can't prove them, and how rubber stamped those charges will be, until such time as you get caught, and in regards to getting caught ~ fat chance of that happening! That's because everyone's afraid of you and your threats ~ not to mention ~ ashamed of the charges, whether or not they're guilty of the charges. Thus, threats, intimidation, coercion, harassment, blackmail, human trafficking, child trafficking, false and/or exaggerated charges, malicious prosecution, fraudulent conviction, Civil Rights Violations, Childrens' Rights Violations, Human Rights Violations... ...everything that Racketeering (RICO) and Conspiracy charges are made of, and who's going to believe them (the accused) over your word, the Prosecution (the accuser), because of the "Color of Authority of Law" you wear and utilize to commit crimes as a Social Worker, oh, and... ...the support you receive from others in Authority, all because your "brothers and sisters" are of the same cause, only your "brothers and sisters" don't find out what a fink YOU are until its too late, and innocent lives have been destroyed. And that's because, somebody challenges them finally ~ and wins. Thus, young son of Lekas ~ "yours isn't the only case in which this publication has heard of and confirmed abuses by Social Workers and Foster Parents against Innocent Parents..." ...yours is merely the first case in which someone has successfully said: "Time for the abuses to end! Time for the Truth to Come Out!" The first of many is my hope. And your Mother's. And your Stepfather's. And two other families waiting in the wings with their cases to present. And an adoptive Mother in Central Nevada whose own daughter tried to murder her to "be" with her Pedophile seducer and lover. And this publication and its Editor are informed, believe and thereon allege, that apparently, that's precisely what is now taking place, as all eyes are suddenly on Washoe County not only due to your Mother's highly competant Attorney, Ken Stover, but what we are publishing here of her case, in her fight to save your soul and protect you from wanton harm. Oh, son ~ if you only knew the sacrifices your Mother, and even your Stepfather, have been making in an effort to try and save you and your entire family. They're not just struggling in this process, they're suffering, due to the attempts to destroy their lives and reputations in the process. Parents have responsibilities. So, too, do Foster Parents, and teaching Foster children (in particular) and others how to play "Beer Pong" ~ especially after those children were taken from a home in which alcohol abuse was alleged, falsely, and even though those charges are false ~ is one of the most inappropriate acts that can be committed by a Foster Parent with responsibility over a Foster Child or Children coming from a Family Home facing such allegations. Obviously, you are still too young to realize that. Water, eh? You say that was "Water" in those red, plastic Dixie cups? The ones you described as Transparent? The Foster Parent herself posted these pictures and captions all by herself. I found them, wide open and accessible on the internet. I sent them to your Mother and directed her to present them to her Attorney. She had no choice nor say in the matter, with evidence that grave suddenly thrust by surprise, into her possession. She had no warning. If she didn't send those pictures to her Attorney as directed, not only would I have dropped coverage of her story, she would have been guilty of a violation of the Law, of that I am sure. So in the end: This was NOT your Mother's call. I publish and edit this newspaper. I am not allowed to hide the Truth when the Public has a "Right to Know," as that is their guaranteed, First Amendment Right. I cannot lie for you to calm your hurt feelings for those with whom you have bonded. The greater harm to you is in covering up the misconduct that went on in your presence and that of others, including your brother and his under-aged girlfriend. I have a responsibility to see that when evidence of a crime falls into my possession and there is no source to protect, that such evidence makes their way into the hands of "Responsible Authorities," of which your Mother's Attorney is one, as he is defined as an "Officer of the Court" and totally entrusted with the Law by any and every Judge of any and every Court he has ever stood before to argue Law. The First Amendment is the Right of The People to a Free Press, not just the Right of members of The Press to Report. Our very foundation in Reporting is "The Right of the People to Know" of the Events ongoing in and around their lives, surrounding their lives, encompassing their lives, enveloping their lives... ...so that they are "informed" and as such, can make "informed decisions," based on the answers to questions they subsequently may have ~ after reading this online newspaper ~ such as: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Is this the Social Services System at work that I'm paying taxes for!?" "Is this what my children might be subject to if they go into Foster Care?" "Do all Foster Parents behave this way?" "I'm paying Social Workers to allow Foster Parents to behave this way around Foster Children!?" "How many Social Workers were at that party and playing!?" "How much are they being paid to care for children and how many children are they caring for, while behaving this way?" "How much in Taxpayer dollars and Court-ordered Child Support levelled on the Parents is going to buy alcohol for the Foster Parents?" "How much money is going for alcohol for underaged minors in Foster Care!?" "Who has oversight of the Foster Parents and this type of 'care' shown Children?" "How do Foster Parents like these pass the Screening Process ~ IF there is one!?" "Are Children better off with Foster Parents living an 'Alcohol Culture' than they are with their own Parents living a life of sobriety, even with some dysfunction? Even with MAJOR Dysfunction!!??" "How are THESE Foster Parents any more functional than Dysfunctional folk!?" "Are Families being torn apart for this!? So their kids can move on and learn to play 'Beer Pong'!?" "If the family reunifies, does the old family wind up with children whom were once sober, but are now a pack of drunks!?" "Having learned 'Beer Pong' from their Foster Parents, will these children now go on to live better lives and contribute productively to a Greater Society!?" "Whatever happened to Frisbees, Limbo, Slinky, Slip-and-slide, Chutes and Ladders, Candyland, Twister, Scrabble, Pick-upStix, Hot Wheels Cars, Barbie, G.I. Joe, Roller Skates, Skateboards and other games and toys kids once liked to play!?" "Tiddly Pong, anyone!? <g>" "How much money in groceries, clothing, toys and real games, could be purchased with the money wasted on 'Beer'!?" "What's next with my tax dollars ~ Sniffing glue!?" "I don't play Beer Pong with my kids ~ why are Foster Parents playing Beer Pong with someone else's kids, and why are Washoe County Social Services promoting this?" "Should these Foster Parents be allowed to continue as Foster Parents at all!?" "How many kids has this Foster Family been in contact with overall!?" "My kid just learned to drive a car! Will my kid and his/her friends live to tell me about that Foster Kid who ran head-on into them, because he was drunk behind the wheel of his Foster Mother's car after a game of 'Beer Pong' with her and her buddies!?" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ These are, after all, son, your fellow citizens, no matter what their adult status or age ~ "The People" who must make informed decisions in their lives, either on a daily, routine, even mundane basis, or in those important moments in our history, when they serve their Country as voters, participants and Patriots, in our albeit, "Limited" Democracy. These are the ones paying for the "Free Ride" Washoe County Social Service Workers are taking and offering you in the process. The "Free Ride" your Mother wants you to pass on so that you can learn the value of making your way through Life on your own terms. Such, is a "Mother's Love." As such, you are offered something far more valuable than what Washoe County Social Services throws like a bone your way, as though you were a dog they'd like to keep out of their way, more than out of trouble. And yet, your Mother's "Love" is more along the lines of what The People would wish for you and their own children, but they cannot, for the the Life of them, seem to find a way to deliver such love to you, through a cold-hearted, mechanical system, where the well-intended usually wind up being caught up in the cogs and greasing the machine, than they are truly being a part of the inner workings that could make such machines successful and productive... ...and that's usually because of the abuses of a mere handfull that make the entire system look like the end result of some Mad Scientist's dark, untenable plan, or at a minimum, something skewered out of a "Pinky and the Brain" cartoon gone horribly wrong. I would put it to you this way: The People not only have a Right to Know, they have a "Need to Know," because the abuses of this Nation's, and this State's in particular, "Social Services System," cannot be allowed to go on any longer. Especially in regards to an 'Alcohol Culture,' because the bottom line is son, you may not be the one killed by drinking or a drunk driver... ...but tonight, someone's child is going to be. In fact, by the time I finish this, twenty children could be dead tonight at the hands of drunk drivers across the country. Is it possible that child might be a friend of yours, going home from a game of 'Beer Pong' at your Foster Mother's home, with a load of your mutual friends in the back seat!? Or perhaps, the Foster Mother will be driving? Can you predict what's going to happen in the lives of others!? Do you know whom can drink and drive but will make it home safely; do you know who won't!? Will it be your best friend? Will it be your girlfriend? Do you love either more than the "Alcohol Culture" that you and others are being introduced to? I cannot predict who will live or die in such scenarios, and I did know two fellow soldiers who both took me by surprise when a Drunk Driver ran into them head-on one night on a German Highway, nearly two decades ago.... ...but in terms of the future, I can sure take preventative measures and hope to avoid any further loss of lives. Gary Marius and Jorge Meaux. Get to know those names. Gary worked in the radio shop making sure our Garrison and Tactical radios worked in the Control Tower, where I worked in Air Traffic Control. Jorge was a new arrival whom I escorted during his in-processing into Schwaebisch Hall, back in the Cold War days when we were all along the border with the East Bloc Nations, the Berlin Wall hadn't fallen and we were minutes from either a Nuclear or a Chemical Attack, while sabres were being rattled. Both men Christians, who met and found that they had that one, paramount issue in common. Saw them at the Motorpool one night, working with another buddy, Rich Gonzales, on a car he had just sold them. Three days later, we were called into formation in front of Battalion headquarters. Seems Jorge had a little too much to drink so Gary, who was sober, was driving. Jorge had his seat belt on. Gary didn't. Struck head-on by a drunken German driver. That man walked away without a scratch and into the custody of the Polizei. Gary died instantly at the scene. Jorge survived for a while. And how timely that was... ...his wife was en route from Puerto Rico with their newborn infant child to be with him. She arrived just in time to turn off the life support machine so that Jorge, declared brain dead, could die with dignity. She had to fly roughly eight hours to Germany to do that; then eight hours home a widow. And thanks to a drunken German driver, and no matter whether or not she's re-married since, a widow is what she remains for the remainder of her own life. As for the rest of us, we held a Memorial and they played "Taps" to two pairs of combat boots in the Chapel on Dolan Barracks. Rich Gonzales couldn't sleep. He stayed up until the Memorial, polishing those two pairs of boots. He blamed himself for having sold them the car. The rest of us were just stunned. Speechless. Heavy hearted, but with no emotions. There was nothing surreal about it. Everything was unreal. It had happened, but had it really? It's a really cold feeling knowing that one of your friends is in the morgue, the other is about to be, and there's nothing you can do about it, nor to change it. Nothing. Thus the hollow feeling of emptiness. Your friends are no longer alive and neither are you. And our friends went home in stainless steel caskets, draped in American Flags, in the cargo hold of a C-141B Starlifter, to their families via Dover AFB, Delaware, and the hearses that awaited them there. And now you know why this one was MY call, not your Mother's, and why I will not lie for you, your Foster Parents or anyone, so as to calm your feelings about folks you think you've bonded with, folks you think you love, but would lie to protect ~ not protect them by telling the Truth and saving their lives in the process ~ folks whom have showed their love for you was not as great as your Mother's for you, nor yours for them. That's all I've got to say on this subject and frankly, it was more than I had intended, and no doubt, more than others would intend I say at all. Your Mother included. Some would rather I say nothing... You tell me ~ is Jorge's Meaux's wife one of them!? And having altered the course of so many lives that night ~ including that of a newborn child ~ I'm curious if you think that German driver would want me to remain quiet, too? In fact, it's been so many years, I think I'm wrong ~ if I recall correctly, I believe she was still pregnant at the time.... Yeah, come blame me, kid... ...once again, your Mother is innocent. In more ways than you'll ever know. In more ways than you'll ever appreciate...until, I think, the day when you stand as an older, much older man, over her grave, once she has found peace and her spirit is gone. Then, maybe you'll realize all that she's done, all that she's been trying to do, fighting for you... ...this alleged, neglectful, abusive, parent, whom is your Mother... ...and has shown herself to be anything but what the Washoe County SS have accused her of! ~ Ed. |
| Breaking
News Alert! # 3 5:05 p.m., July 29, 2009 A Mother's Love... ...ATTACKED by Washoe County Social Services!!! Washoe County Social Services Moves in to Seize Karen Lekas' Daughter "Alicia," based on trumped up allegations that "Alicia," had contact with her Step father, David Sharra.
We'll have more on this story soon, occurring at a time when Karen Lekas' son wants to come home, is with the Mother at this time, has strangely enough NOT been taken from the Mother, nor has any other child, and is there in support of her. Washoe County is obviously losing their cases and being exposed for their considerable wrong-doing. Today's Panic Attack by the County is living Proof that, if they had a legitimate leg to stand on in the first place, they would have prosecuted their cases against Sharra and Lekas long ago! Instead, Washoe County now exposes itself and the Bad Light of Public Opinion is upon them ~ and they know it ~ and so too, does the Attorney representing Karen Lekas, one Ken Stover. Can the County afford the Lawsuits that are coming for Civil Rights, Childrens' Rights and Human Rights violations? No more than they can stand to lose the nearly 1,000 cash cows represented by children kidjacked and taken by Washoe County into its ill-begotten Social Services System. "Alicia" today becomes a symbol of all the wrongs done by Washoe County and its Social Services system to others. She is frightened, will need therapy after being "confiscated" like chattel from her parents, and emotionally abused by Washoe County Social Service workers! She clung to her Mother and would not let go! And as you've seen by Karen's letters to Emily Smith and Lance White, Stetson has stated he wants to come home, has wanted to for some time, didn't think he had a say in the matter, and has been coached by Washoe County Social Services into saying what they want him to say in attacks upon his Mother and Step Father, whom are guilty of no wrong. Yes, Virginia, there is a Gestapo, and her it lives in Goosestepping Glory, in Washoe County... The Land of Hate in America! ~~~~~~~~~~ "We are reminded by the Jews who endured and suffered the Holocaust, to "Never Forget!" 64 years later, we've not only forgotten, it would appear that we don't know a damned thing about the Civil and Human Rights of others, including children. Where do we go from here!?" ~ Ed. ~~~~~~~~~~ There is more to this story coming soon, so stay tuned to Silver State News Service of Nevada, and watch Washoe County and its corruption as they self destruct... ...hand-in-hand with the City of Reno! Apparently the "Bad Press" has been getting to them, and the "Bad Press" isn't going to go away. |
| Breaking
News Alert! # 4 5:05 p.m., July 29, 2009 A Mother's Love... ...Kept in the Dark by Washoe County Social Services! The following is an exchange that occurred this morning in regards to Karen Lekas' son, Stetson, who has been removed from his Foster Parents home. The Natural Mother received a message that she would be able to speak with him, however, her son appears to be sequestered away from all contact. ~~~~~~~~~~ Karen Lekas <> |
| Breaking
News Alert! # 4 5:05 p.m., July 29, 2009 The Heinous, Brazen Behavior of Washoe County Social Services and their Gestapo! We have just received confirmation of what we long ago feared... Washoe County, which had been demanding that Karen Lekas divorce David Sharra or she "would never get your child back," did succeed in forcing the Sharra's to Divorce, against their will. In addition, we have a report that the former Mrs. Sharra's health is potentially suffering a setback today as a result of the horrendous stress that Washoe County has put her through, and that her blood pressure has risen so high that her doctor wishes to hospitalize and treat her, in hopes of preventing the stroke. We have also spoken with David Sharra today, who is devastated by all of these events and cannot understand why "they keep picking on her..." All we can say David, as observers, is that "they keep picking on her" because she is winning, and they are desperate, as they at Washoe County Social Services stand to "lose it all" if they don't silence her and soon, even if it means killing her in the process! We will have more shortly on this developing story of the continued corruption eating away like a cancer on the inside, at the Washoe County Social Services Division, here in Washoe County itself... ~~~~~~~~~~ The Land of Hate in America! People exist in Washoe County, but they don't live here... ...there is no Justice, and where there is no Justice, there is no hope! With no hope, no reason to live. One can only exist for the dawn of a new day, but one does so without hope. ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Breaking
News Alert! # 2 12:00 p.m., July 28, 2009 A Mother's Love... ...Continues: New Exchanges Overnight and Today Between Karen Lekas, Emily Smith and Lance White of Washoe County Social Services, Regarding Her Son... (Editor's Note: Emphasis Added) ~~~~~~~~~~ --- On Tue, 7/28/09, Karen
Lekas <karentxgirl@yahoo.com> wrote: |
| Breaking
News Alert! 10:55 p.m., July 23, 2009 A Mother's Love Exchange Today Between Karen Lekas, Emily Smith and Lance White of Washoe County Social Services, Regarding Her Son... (Editor's Note: Emphasis Added) ~~~~~~~~~~ Good Morning Emily, But I think family is much
more important and he should not stay in care just for a
"free ride". |
| Related
Story: Breaking News Alert! 2:15 p.m., July 15, 2009 Exchange Today Between Karen Lekas and Lance White, Her Representative at Washoe County, Regarding Her Son... ~~~~~~~~~~ Good Morning Lance On Wed, 7/15/09, White, Lance
C <LCWhite@washoecounty.us> wrote: |
| SSNS News
Brief 7/16/2009 The case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas has been continued until August 14, 2009, while the new Opposing Counsel gets educated as to the contents of the Case Files. |
EXTRA! Misconduct by Washoe County District Attorneys Office Outlined in Defendant's Motion for Dismissal in State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas! ~~~~~~~~~~ Reno Attorney Ken Stover demands dismissal of charges "With Prejudice" (No further prosecution can occur) or Disqualification of the Washoe County District Attorney, Dick Gammick, for misconduct by a non-lawyer employee of the District Attorneys Office and "criminal misconduct" by Washoe County Social Services. Privacy Act protected records released by Washoe County officials illegally and with intent to cause harm. |
| Breaking
News Alert! 8:56 a.m. July 10, 2009 Silver State News Service has confirmed that the Staff Member in the Office of District Attorney Richard "Dick" Gammick, that was responsible for speaking with Karen Lekas in regards to her case without her Attorney being present, was none other than Jay Mannlein, who is now accused by three women in a Federal Lawsuit in regards to Violent Threats of Physical Harm against them while they worked for the District Attorney. The District Attorney was required to remove himself from the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas and now the threat looms that other cases may also be similarly affected. Our concern at Silver State News Service is that if these allegations prove true in Federal Court, and the D.A. failed as alleged to do anything about these issues for his Staff, then what are the damages that could be done if such an individual, operating under Color of Authority, operated in such a manner with frightened women accused of crimes, to include Single and Married Mothers accused by Washoe County Social Services, Law Enforcement and the D.A., of Child Abuse? SSNS believes that the investigation into the charges against D.A. Staff Member Jay Mannlein need to be expanded to include potential victims outside the D.A.'s Office, particularly those accused or being investigated for any, way, shape or form, of crime. |
| Extra 7 !!! In Brief State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas |
![]() The Litigation Page The Court Minutes Regarding the Removal of District Attorney Dick Gammick from the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas. The case is now referred to the State Attorney General for a decision in regards to continued prosecution or dismissal of the charges. |
| The
Litigation Page ~ State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas District Attorney Dick Gammick Removes D.A.'s Office from case in State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas
~~~~~~~~~~ by
Mark S. "Bear" Daniels ~~~~~~~~~~ Reno, NV, July 10, 2009 (ILIPS Group International) ~ Silver State News Service is getting caught up on its reporting following a series of events that delayed our coverage of the cases of Karen Lekas and two other families newly arrived and joining the case of Michael Sue Nichols in regards to Social Service abuses in Nevada and California. The delays included a severe illness suffered by the Editor, who now appears to be recovering after months of limited activities and bedrest. In addition, during his recovery, the Editor was arrested by members of the Reno National Championship Invitational Death For Entertainment Only Air Races, out at Stead Airport, Nevada. Discussions are underway with Attorneys and Free Press advocates across the United States and in Europe. Add to that an embezzlement effort that created havoc that is now almost fully overcome, save for the Civil and Criminal prosecution of the individual(s) responsible. After months of delays and interuptions, we at SSNS have resumed the fight and will pro-actively continue the presentation of the cases involving these families, whom are currently entangled with the Social Service system in the State of Nevada and Washoe County, and in particular, in regards to the confiscation of and Trafficking in their persons and that of their children. Child Trafficking, Human Trafficking, Conspiracy, Racketeering, Fraud and Major Fraud Directed Against the United States of America, alleged and/or to be alleged in their cases. Right in the van is the case of Karen Lekas, whom Silver State News Service believes is falsely accused of giving alchohol to the daughter of her new husband, David Sharra, a charge that even Sharra denies since he indicates that Ms. Lekas wasn't even present at home in the moment his child showed signs of dizziness and inability to walk. That the child was intoxicated is confirmed by reports from the Hospital physicians that examined her, however, it has been learned by Ms. Lekas (Mrs. Sharra) that her teenage sons were involved in drinking ~ with one confirmed by Social Services as an admitted alcoholic ~ and the actual source of the alcohol is believed to be a drink left unattended by one of the teenage boys, who had smuggled the alcohol into the home, disguising it in a soda can and leaving it out in the open, where the child found it and drank from it, believing it to be soda pop and not an alcoholic beverage. Mrs. Sharra also alleges, along with her husband, that the two boys utilized the incident in an attempt to "run away from home" with the assistance of Washoe County Social Services representative Michelle Rosencrantz, whom at the time of the allegations, had a family member that was dating one of the two boys. Add to that, the fact that Michelle Rosencrantz delivered Privacy Act-protected records to the ex-wife of David Sharra, for use against him in a California Child Custody battle, and the plot thickens into major violations of Federal Law, including Major Civil Rights violations. With the latest incidents coming out of District Attorney Gammick's Office, and in the opinion of this Editor, the case no longer bodes well for Washoe County or the State of Nevada, and from observations of the potential Civil Rights case that will exist solely based on misconduct by the Prosecution so far, to include Washoe County Social Services, it would appear that Karen Lekas will have a formidable lawsuit against County and State minimum, over misconduct by their Agents and Vectors in this case. Stay tuned for further developments as we learn more about this important victory by Attorney Kenneth Stover on Karen Lekas' behalf, to include the possible connection with the Federal Lawsuit filed against the Office of the Washoe County D.A. |
![]() The Litigation Page District Attorney Gammick's Response Page 1 Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative, Motion to Disqualify the Washoe County District Attorney. Response filed by D.A. Richard Gammick and Assistant D.A. Kelly Ann Partin. |
![]() The Litigation Page District Attorney Gammick's Response Page 2 As signed by Deputy D.A. Partin |
![]() The Litigation Page District Attorney Gammick's Response Page 3 The District Attorney concurs with the Defense in regards to his Office's removal from the case of State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas. A major victory for Ms. Lekas (Mrs. David Sharra) as handed to her by the very progressive and shrewd, Attorney Kenneth "Ken" Stover, Esq. |
![]() The Litigation Page District Attorney Gammick's Response Page 4 All documents are presented by this publication ~ as much as is humanly possible ~ in their entirety. This page merely deals with affirmation that no Social Security numbers are contained in the document, which immediately becomes Public Record, unless sealed by the Court. |
![]() The Litigation Page District Attorney Gammick's Response Page 5 Service of Document |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 # 1 ~~~~~~~~~~ EXCLUSIVE! ~~~~~~~~~~ Karen Lekas vs Washoe County (vs State of Nevada) ~~~~~~~~~~ This case has previously been identified here at SSNS as Anon # 1 vs Washoe County Social Services. With the permission of Ms. Lekas' Attorney, Ken Stover, Esq., of Reno, Nevada, and Karen Lekas herself, we now present her case and name along with this action, a Motion for Dismissal or "Disqualification," filed on or about May 18, 2009. As SSNS Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels anticipates being on the road today, a much more thorough examination of the documents will follow. At present, Lekas' private Attorney, Ken Stover, Esq., is demanding the dismissal of the Washoe County District Attorney from the case and/or the assignment of the case to the Nevada State Attorney General, or, dismissal of the case altogether "With Prejudice," meaning the case can no longer be prosecuted. This case involves false allegations being filed against Ms. Lekas, primarily by her two eldest sons. Both young men, one now of adult age, alleged that Ms. Lekas had given alcohol to the daughter of her new husband, David Mawhorter (a.k.a. Anon # 2, a.k.a. "David Sharra,") a charge which is denied by both. In the filing, the Attorney repeats what both Karen Lekas and her husband David Sharra knew all along ~ that Karen had an alibi: Karen was not at the house and was called by Dave while on the road after the child became dizzy and had trouble standing. One of the two sons making the erroneous charge has since been determined to be an alcoholic. Both had revenge as a motive. A third child also reporting the incident had conflicts with his new stepfather and has subsequently recanted his story. According to Ms. Lekas, her Attorney indicates that there are 2,000 documents in the case, and one need only read the first two hundred to determine her innocence in the case. ...not to mention, the actual source of the alcohol given to the then four year old child (2008): The eldest son. Additional lawsuits are pending as David Sharra, who changed his name from that of Mawhorter ~ his adoptive family name ~ back to "Sharra," that of his natural father, alleges that a Washoe County Social Worker illegally gave Privacy Act protected records from his wife Karen Lekas' (Mawhorter) case to his ex-wife, one Bobbie Mawhorter, and that those records were illegally used against him in a California Court successfully, during a second, unlawful attempt with a different Judge. Sharra stands to gain the return of custody to his now five-year old daughter the moment charges are dropped against Karen Lekas, according to the orders of a California State Court with current jurisdiction over the child. The first Judge in that Solano County case had ordered the records to be given to Sharra, and Sharra's ex-wife and Attorney were advised against such an attempt. That Judge was reassigned to another case due to an operational change within the Court, and a second attempt by the pair then circumvented the order of the first Judge, resulting in the denial of Sharra's Civil Rights, and those possessed by his daughter, at a subsequent hearing with the new Judge. Opposing Counsel for the former Mrs. Bobbie Mawhorter stood and identified the records presented as "Voluminous." Silver State News Service is in possession of a document from Washoe County indicating that the records were provided to Mrs. Mawhorter by Washoe County Social Services. Within that Washoe County document, there is no statement of regard for the Law in this matter, Local, State or Federal, accompanying that admission. The Law goes ignored... The Privacy awarded to records of Washoe County beyond the mandatory Federal Privacy Act issues, is to protect the "Clients" from harm, which include Karen Lekas and David Sharra in Nevada, their family, and his five-year-old daughter in California. Mrs. Lekas had two of her children taken away and had to barter those children to protect the younger children in the home from confiscation and trafficking by Washoe County Social Services. Civil and Criminal lawsuits can be expected to follow. Somewhere in Reno, Nevada, today ~ a Private Attorney has done his job properly ~ and his client is proud! That's "one!" Good job, Ken Stover! ~~~~~~~~~~ Much more to come... ...stay tuned to Silver State News Service, of Nevada. Please refer to the Case documents below this table. Though the documents below are self-explanatory, we will have further commentary later following the completion of our own Reply to Defendant's Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss, in the case of Mark S. "Bear" Daniels vs Dannie G. Serfoss Jr., et al. ~~~~~~~~~~
Allegations against Washoe County Social Services and Child Protective Services worker Michelle Rosencrantz, include ~ and in particular ~ that Karen Lekas' eldest son / David Sharra's eldest stepson, was dating Ms. Rosencrantz's niece at the time. A verbal altercation between Rosencrantz and Sharra, in which Sharra admitted to using the "C" word against her, resulted in the retaliatory supplying of confidential, protected Case files in the Karen Lekas case, by Michelle Rosencrantz to Sharra's ex-wife for use against him. Though Sharra apologized, he reports being scolded by Rosencrantz that "You can't talk to me that way ~ I'm in a position of power!" In regards to false allegations of "inappropriate touching" of Lekas' daughter alleged against Sharra, according to Karen Lekas: "Dave's case has been made to go away." How the case went away will be of interest to our readers, to be sure! <g> ~~~~~~~~~~
In the meantime, Karen Lekas recently learned that her second eldest son is no longer considered a candidate for "reunification" by Washoe County. The process has already been started to adopt this child out to another family, according to the message relayed by Karen Lekas to Silver State News on Thursday, May 28, 2009. The process started without Lekas or her Attorney being informed of the fact or the reasons "why." The criminal case against Lekas has not been concluded nor for that matter, "won" by Washoe County District Attorney Dick Gammick, whose dismissal from the case has been demanded in the Court filing below in Karen Lekas' case. ~~~~~~~~~~
We are in contact with another case via the mother of a Disabled child made a Ward of the Court by Washoe County. The Civil Rights of the Mother and Child, the latter of whom has now turned adult age, are violated according to the Mother and all contact between the two cut off by Washoe County Social Services. This case involves ADKT 411 and the Commission on the Rights of the Indigent to Appointment of Counsel. The United States Supreme Court has identified where the State of Nevada has not done enough to see that Indigent Defendants receive proper appointment of Counsel. Standing as an obstacle in the way of proper Indigent Defense: Nevada Rules regarding Attorney Conduct and the demand on appointed Defense Attorneys that the State is their client before the Indigent Defendant. In this regard, the State prosecutes and defends itself in the same case, and the Attorney-Client privilege is irrevocably violated in that, the State as defendant can now share information regarding the Indigent accused of a crime or misconduct, with the State (itself) as prosecutor. This represents multiple Civil Rights violations under the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights (First Ten Amendments to the Constitution) and subsequent 14th Amendment. Silver State News Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels confronted the Chief Justice of the Nevada State Supreme Court, Chief Justice James Hardesty, on that issue in the January time frame. A hostile encounter ensued with the Chief Justice indicating that "we're looking into that." What is there to look into? This is an "In your face" Civil Rights violation printed in Black and White within the Nevada books of Law, Rules and Procedure, to include "Attorney Conduct." To date, the Nevada State Supreme Court have not published the audio files, nor the televised record, of the exchange between Chief Jutice Hardesty and this Editor. Did they forget to publish the Commission meeting? <g> Or are they just afraid... The Nevada Supreme Court had been meeting on the issue of ADKT 411 and the Commission's presentation to them, with Public Comment allowed. The matter was televised in Carson City and Las Vegas, Nevada, minimum. And this Editor hasn't seen so much hugging, backslapping and grandstanding going on, since his last appearance at a "Cardio Pulmonary Recessitation (CPR)" Convention where the Heimlich Maneuver was being taught for the first time! The discrepancies between Attorney Rules of Professional Conduct and the State as the Client of appointed, Indigent Defense Attorneys was pointed out. Those that heard me in the back of the Supreme Court Chamber said I was certainly "loud enough" to be heard. We are still waiting to hear from the Nevada State Supreme Court on this critical, Civil Rights issue. |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 1 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 2 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 3 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 4 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 5 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 6 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 7 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 8 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 9 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 10 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 11 |
Breaking News Alerts! Active: May 27, 2009 thru June 7, 2009 Breaking News Alert # 1 Page 12 (End of Document) MORE CASE NEWS TO FOLLOW... |
| Editor's
Choice: Troubled Times for Child Protective & Family Services Everywhere... Lassen County Grand Jury releases final report for 2003-2004 "If substantial progress has not been made within six months, the jury recommends the State of California Department of Social Services take over Lassen County Child Protective Services and provide the necessary care and protection for the children of Lassen County until a new and better agency can be formed." ~ Barbara France,
News Editor |
![]() Parents Opposed to Human Trafficking by Washoe County Social Services Deliberate delay and/or refusal to provide records is part of the Modus Operandi (Method of Operation) being unlawfully conduct by Washoe County Social Services, Child Protective Services and District Attorneys Office workers, to include communications of threats against the victim in this case, presently identified as "Anon # 1," until release of her name is authorized by her Defense Attorney, the latter of whom is reported as "equally upset" with the system as his client is. |
| Parents
Opposed to Human Trafficking by Washoe County Social
Services Holds First Meeting... Persecuted Parents Meet to Form "PACT" ~ "Parents Against Child Trafficking" ~ a Group having a "Pact" with Children, as well as Indigent Adults, to Oppose Child Stealing and Criminal Abuses by Washoe County Social Services & CPS. PACT" expected to spread to other States, including and in particular, California, in the fight against Fraud, False Misrepresentation, False charges being filed against Innocent Parents and others, and Perjury directed towards aiding and abetting Human Trafficking to illegally profit from Private, State and Federal Funding sources. "PACT" moves in opposition to Washoe County Abuses and tries to level the playing field in these areas, including, but not limited to:
~~~~~~~~~~ by Mark S. "Bear" Daniels Silver Knolls, NV, 12/03/2008 (ILIPS) ~ Though it was a long time coming, the first meeting of Parents abused by Washoe County Social Services, Child Protective Services and local area Courts, was held tonight at the home of Silver State News Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels (yours truly...), here in Silver Knolls, Nevada, and for a change, this time the "guests" were actually invited! (Re: Stalker Story Below...) Michael Sue Nichols, Joan Carol Serfoss and Anon # 1 met with Silver State News Publisher and Editor Daniels, with whom a meeting was conducted in which a wide range of topics were discussed, connecting Washoe County Social Service Agencies, alleged "Child Advocacy Groups," the Washoe County D.A., as well as Local, State and Federal Courts, with issues that include, but not limited to, Human Trafficking (See List Above). The abuses all have suffered at the hands of the Governments of the United States, the States of Nevada and California, Washoe and Esmeralda Counties, and alleged Child Advocacy Groups, to include, but not limited to, Child Protective Services (CPS) and CASA, were laid out in testimony and documented evidence, and presented as a foundation of reasoning for formation of the new Group dedicated to ending Abuses by and Reforming Washoe County Social Services and its associated/subordinate Agencies and Offices. Profiteering off of Human Trafficking resulting in Major Fraud Directed Against the State and Federal Government were outlined in heavy detail with additional evidence and testimony still to be presented during upcoming meetings. The Offices of a United States Senator involved with the Affairs of Health & Human Services have expressed an interest in Nevada State and Washoe County system failures, as well as Fraud resulting from Human Trafficking, and have provided an outline of what they need to prosecute a case against the State of Nevada and Washoe County, in particular, for Major Fraud against the United States Government. The meeting was recorded and comments will be presented shortly. Interviews are still being conducted and case evidence presently being provided to Silver State News for publication and exposure to the Public. Silver State News has also been given permission by Anon # 2, whose case we are following, to release his information and name for publication. Anon # 2 is falsely accused of Child Abuse, has been improperly "convicted" by Child Protective Services (CPS), who are now seeking District Attorney prosecution of the case. The case is three months old and withering under scrutiny even as the case is about to be presented to the D.A. Critical to the case is an act of Vengeance Seeking and Retaliation directed against the alleged perpetrator named in the false charges, by a Washoe County Social Worker whom he referred to as a "C~nt," whom has a major Conflict of Interest in handling his case ~ a Conflict that was evident at the beginning ~ and whom informed the alleged perpetrator (a man we refer to as a "Victim") that he would never have custody of his child again, a threat made good when the Social Worker presented his ex-wife with "Voluminous" copies of his current wife's sealed, Confidential, Case File. That case file was ordered returned to the man, however, the Judge's were changed and the second, replacement Judge, is now unlawfully utilizing the sealed records to deny the man Visitation with his child while ordering the man to pay Child Support none the less. The man and his current wife have documented records showing Child Support paid to his ex-wife, who subsequently and simultaneously was allegedly committing Welfare Fraud by failing to declare the income to both the Courts and the Social Services systems. Further undermining and complicating the D.A.'s/CPS's case in advance of presentation to the Office of District Attorney Dick Gammick, is the fact that Gammick's Office has threatened the man's current wife by alluding to further retaliations against her if she doesn't "Shut Up" in regards to inquiries submitted to retired Deputy District Attorney Greg Shannon. These inquiries are in further regards to Shannon's support and order that her child's records be released to her in support of her Defense against the Washoe County Social Services and CPS allegations of Child Abuse against her, which are also in serious doubt, based on the evidence presented to Silver State News over the past two weeks. There is much more to come in these astounding and outrageous cases of Washoe County Social Services and Child Protective Services abuses, including those directed at the Children within the system itself, involving the perpetration of crimes against Parents by Washoe County Social Services and Child Protective Services Workers and so-called "Advocates." |
![]() Parents Opposed to Human Trafficking by Washoe County Social Services Lines 21 thru 24 spell out the delivery by a State of Nevada, Washoe County Social Services/Child Protective Services Social Worker ~ one Michelle Rosencrantz ~ of sealed, confidential documentation to the court in violation of Client Confidentiality, which Washoe County cited in refusing Silver State News "Client Information" a mere two weeks ago. Michelle Rosencrantz is not only alleged to have delivered the case files to Anon # 2's ex-wife has a means of Vengeance Seeking and retaliation for being called a "C~nt" (a.k.a. the derogatory "C" word, directed by men towards women with regard to a woman's genitalia...), but is also alleged to have a major Conflict of Interest in the case since one of the man's step-children, who has made allegations against the man and his current wife over "Child Abuse," this after he (the "Minor" had his truck taken away for striking his mother and referring to her by the "B" word (a.k.a. "female dog"), was dating her niece at the time. Additional abuses can be seen on the page where the man's wife is accused ~ but not convicted ~ of "Felony Charges," and the charges are spoken in her regards and in such a manner that, one is left to believe that instead of being "innocent until proven guilty," she is in fact guilty without regard to Due Process... ...something that has been going on in this country against all the People for too long, resulting in Criminals made into "Victims," and "Victims" of crimes made into "Criminals," and our Justice System turned into a laughingstock as just one of the end results. Much more to come on the abuses of this particular worker whom, not surprisingly, came up during conversation last night and in more than one of the cases belonging to the people gathered to form "PACT." |
![]() Parents Opposed to Human Trafficking by Washoe County Social Services The letter sent by a State of Nevada, Washoe County Social Services/Child Protective Services Social Worker ~ one Dianna Mann, "Intake Screener" ~ containing confidential "Client" information addressed to the ex-wife of Anon # 2, in violation of the same "Client Confidentiality rule," which Washoe County cited in refusing Silver State News "Client Information" a mere two weeks ago. This information and "Voluminous" case files delivered later by Michelle Rosencrantz to Anon # 2's ex-wife, subsequently enabled the ex-wife to have all visitation between Anon # 2 and his child cut off in an illegal citation to (by the ex-wife and her Attorney, on transcript) and by a California Judge, in Solano County, despite a previous Court ruling by another Judge. The ex-wife is now reportedly under investigation for Welfare Fraud for collecting Child Support provided voluntarily by Anon # 2, then failing to report the money to Social Services and others. Anon # 2, whose name and additional case information will be revealed later this evening, is falsely accused by CPS of Child Abuse involving "inappropriate touching" of his step-daughter, which are denied by both him and his current wife, the natural mother of the child. The Mother has been informed by Washoe County Officials that if she does not Divorce the man, she will lose custody of her child. She is under threat that if she is seen with the man her children will be taken away. Both Mother and (Step) Father (Anon # 2) have support of family and friends, including statements eminating from people who work alongside the Mother in the Medical Profession. The Mother is a nurse. |
![]() Parents Opposed to Human Trafficking by Washoe County Social Services Allegations against Washoe County Social Services and Child Protective Services worker Michelle Rosencrantz, including and in particular, that Anon # 2's eldest stepson was dating Ms. Rosencrantz's niece, as stated in Item 1, and the supplying of confidential, protected Case files to Anon # 2's ex-wife for use against him, though Due Process hadn't been carried out at the time and no charges, let alone, conviction, have been leveled by the Washoe County D.A., Dick Gammick. |
| The
Following Sections Are Under Update With New Materials As Of July 12, 2009 |
| The
Curious Case of Michael Sue Nichols False charges of attempted murder against resident of Dyer, Nevada. Woman persecuted by enemies in the Fishlake Valley area, including an alcholic Sheriff and a violent-prone Deputy Sheriff, whom aided and abetted woman's adopted daughter into the hands of a Pedophile. Adopted Daughter and third party discuss poisoning woman on audio recording. Woman falsely accused by known Thug, Drug Dealer, cult Leader and Wife Beater, of harassing him. Adopted Daughter admits being in possession of woman's stolen identification cards (Identity Theft). Adopted Daughter found to be unbelievable by California CPS, which none the less proceeds to persecute Woman over the same charges despite their own reports exonerating the Woman. Civil Rights Violations, Human Rights Violations, Elder Abuse, Abuses Directed Against a Severely Disabled Woman, Pain and Suffering by Victim and Family Members. Much, much more... Updated July 7, 2009 |
| State
of Nevada vs Karen Lekas Case presently headed for Final hearing but may be continued due to New Discover of additional abuses by, but not limited to, Washoe County Social Services, the Washoe County District Attorneys Office and Child Protective Services. New: Demand made by Defense Counsel that the Washoe County District Attorney disqualify himself from the case and that the case either be dismissed for Attorney/Agent Misconduct or in the alternative, reassigned for prosecution by the State Attorney General's Office. Involves Human Trafficking and Abuse charges against Washoe County Social Services for attempting to adopt out Woman's children without regard to her Civil Rights. Human, Children's Rights and Civil Rights Violations. Obstruction of Justice, Threatening and Tampering with Witnesses, Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations. Mandate of Law not being followed by Washoe County Social Services and CPS. Abuses by Washoe County involving interference in family quality time at School Sporting events. Includes abuses by group known as "The Children's Cabinet" wherein violent teen, who struck and was abusive to his Mother, was removed from the Home based on allegation that Mother had given 4-year-old daughter alcohol. Charge is denied. Belief is that child took a drink from a soda can belonging to teen's younger brother and that alchohol was hidden inside. Mother and Step-father later learned after the teen was removed from the home that he had been dealing illicit drugs with a younger brother and attempted to stop both from this criminal misconduct. Older teen now an adult after turning age 18. Reportedly dealing drugs out of a foster home. Reportedly was dealing drugs while at The Children's Cabinet and before move into foster home. Told Mother how they would sneak out through a window opened just so far to avoid setting off an alarm. Adult 18 year-old now reported as having illicit relations with underage girl at her home The 18-year-old's Mother indicates that he will never get into trouble since the underaged girl's own Mother ~ a former stripper ~ is being supplied with drugs by the 18-year-old. 18-year-old's Mother falsely accused by him and his younger brother while teens, of giving alchohol to her husband's four-year-old daughter. Mother denies the charge. Husband declares her innocent. Mother ordered by Child Protective Services to Divorce Father. Suffering retaliations from CPS despite separation from father caused by Harassment and Abuse at the hands of Washoe County Social Services and CPS workers, to include, The Children's Cabinet. Conflicts of Interest ~ Director of Washoe County Social Services is on the Board of The Children's Cabinet, along with other Washoe County officials, including Judges. Group sponsored by Scolari's Food & Drug Company, currently facing charges of Sexual Harassment in EEOC vs Scolari's. Identity Withheld Temporarily at Request of Attorney. More... Updated July 12, 2009 |
| Washoe
County vs David Sharra Washoe County, Nevada, officials attempting to try man on false charges of improperly touching an underaged girl, his step-daughter. The man has been "found" to have been properly served and "found Guilty" of the charges, however, a major problem exists in the fact that he was not served nor present in the court room during the hearing! Involves multiple Civil Rights violations. Also, Human Trafficking and Abuse charges against Washoe County Social Services for attempting to taint Defendant's reputation with Child Abuse charges and to take away child/step-children without regard to Defendant's Civil Rights. Human, Children's Rights and Civil Rights Violations. Obstruction of Justice, Threatening and Tampering with Witnesses, Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) violations. Mandate of Law not being followed by Washoe County Social Services and CPS.Human, Civil Rights violations directed against the Father, his child and step-children. In act of revenge, Female Worker from State of Nevada, Washoe County Social Services, Child Protective Services, offended by being addressed as "C" Word, transmitted case documents illegally and in violation of existing Court orders, as well as Privacy Act, to Defendant's ex-wife. Ex-wife and her Attorney brought Confidential documents into case. Both Ex-wife and Counsel ordered to return documents to Defendant by first Judge. This did not happen. Judges changed while case in process but before CPS became involved. Washoe County Deputy District Attorney Greg Shannon instructed CPS to stop talking to the man's ex-wife and also told them that they had better not be giving her any information. These instructions were apparently too late as they had already committed their misconduct. Deputy DA Shannon also allegedly told CPS to release records belonging to the man's new wife in May, 2008. The new wife still does not have the records as of this time of writing, November 19, 2008. The new wife sent Deputy D.A. Shannon a letter requesting that he remind CPS to give her the records. The D.A. (Gammick) called the new Wife's CPS Attorney and told him to tell the Wife to keep her mouth shut. Deputy D.A. Shannon is now retired. Second Judge subsequently bars reasonable visitation with daughter based on entry of Confidential documents into the case after first Judge allegedly transferred, though she hears cases in the same Courthouse. Conflicts of Interest ~ to see daughter under supervised visitation, the man must pay the Rainbow Children's Center by the hour for supervision and all related expenses, this after his ex-wife had initially been ordered to share the expenses. Rainbow Children's Center is a Department of the Solano County District Attorney's Office, in California. This Father now has to complete an intake with the Rainbow Children's Center, and though they are open every day, they only do intakes on certain days and they will not work with the Father. The ex-wife is ordered to speak with him about the welfare of the child but refuses. Even if the Father does does what is expected, he will be denied his visits. The Father is obstructed in his attempts to visit with his child on supervised visitation. Beyond the ex-wife's intransigence, there are allegations that the Rainbow Children's Center personnel have also told the man's ex-wife to never speak to him in regards to visitation. According to his current Wife, Rainbow Children's Center personnel told the ex-wife that is was "best if they handled it." The current Wife indicated that "that's because they really scewed up (name witheld) intake on the first visit, and then they tired to blame it on the ex-wife. When we got the ex-wife's story, it seems rainbow did it." Identity withheld to protect an innocent man... Much, much more... Updated July 12, 2009 |
| The
Case of Jaqui and Claire The case of a Mother and her developmentally disabled child, who was taken from her at age 17, while the Mother was attempting to move the child to a new home from one providing substandard care. Communications between child and mother slowly being terminated. Mother alleges false allegations made against her in deliberate attempt by County to keep child. Guardian appointed to child at age of Adulthood. No intent by County of Reunifying mother and child. Documented Child abuse by County Officials, their Agents and/or Vectors alleged. Child allegedly being held hostage as pawn for Fraud directed against the U.S. Government. County allegedly attempting to make a "Monster" out of the Mother. Mother's Civil Rights allegedly violated by Court. Appointed Counsel resigned. No new Counsel appointed. Mother not informed of her Right to nor given the opportunity to seek new Counsel. Forced to represent herself in a Court of Law without regard to her abilities at self-representation, of which she describes as "none." Updated July 7, 2009 |
| Anon
3 & 4 vs Washoe County Case involving family of six wherein four children have been taken from the family by Social Services, with allegations by the parents that the County has no intent of reunifying the parents with their children. Parents allege that the children are being kept from them based on false allegations, falsified documentation and false reporting. County alleges negligence by the family in the care of the children. Family acknowledges that mistakes were made, however, possesses documentation of false charges being filed in regards to alleged drug use and other acts the family has not committed. Drug use, let alone abuse, denied. The family wishes to remain anonymous at this time due to fear of retaliation by County Officials. Indicates that at least one County offical has tried to help them. Updated July 12, 2009 |
| Daniels
vs RARA Federal cases involving Racketeering and Fraud activities directed against the U.S. Government, The People and their Treasury. Includes Civil Rights violations and allegations of Attempted Murder and now, Negligent Homicide. Human and Civil Rights violations. Major Fraud Case pending filing on or about January 1, 2009. Service of documents underway. Conflicts of Interest ~ RARA, RARF and the AAWC represented by State Senator William Raggio and the Jones Vargas Law Firm; Raggio the Father of the AAWC; Jones Vargas Attorneys lobbying Raggio in the Nevada State Senate. Much, much more... Updated July 12, 2009 |
| Daniels
vs Serfoss Jr. Case involving threats made against the life of Publisher/Editor Mark S. "Bear" Daniels by Dannie G. Serfoss Jr. of the Serfoss Crime Family and his henchmen and hench "women" in this case. Conflicts of Interest between Judges, Law Enforcement and Serfoss Crime Family. Esmeralda County involvement in crimes. Updated July 12, 2009 |
| Serfoss
vs Serfoss "What they do to one of us, they do to all of us." ~ Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. 78-year-old Mother of Publisher swindled by Con Artist and Fraud, his children, her own Attorney, Step-children and their counsel, along with Appointed Receiver(s), out of land she worked and paid for while greedy Step-children have no investment in property. Property held in Joint Tenancy, which supercedes a Divorce Decree or a Will. Judge John P. Davis steals the land away for the Step-children, the wife of one of them an Esmeralda County official. Civil Rights Violations, Human Rights Violations, Elder Abuse, Abuses Directed Against a Severely Disabled Woman, Pain and Suffering by Victim and Family Members. Star Chamber Operations that aided and abetted the unworthy step-children. Illegal sale to daughter of step-son, Dannie G. Serfoss Jr. Multiple Conflicts of Interest between Judges, Attorneys, Serfoss Crime Family, Esmeralda County Officals, and many others. Much, much more... Updated July 12, 2009 |
| The
Litigation Page Recent Litigation and Case filings in all cases currently being covered by Silver State News Service. Updated July 12, 2009 |
| The
Following Sections Are Under Update With New Materials As Of July 12, 2009 |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| Crimes of Hate "A hate crime is a criminal offense committed against a person or property motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a racial group, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, or disability. The offense is considered a hate crime whether or not the offender's perception of the victim as a member or supporter of a protected group is correct." ~ 1999 National Crime Victim Survey ~~~~~~~~~~ NRS
193.1675 Additional penalty: Commission of crime because
of certain actual or perceived characteristics of victim. |
| State
of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas From:
Karen Lekas 12/03/2008
~ Good Morning Emily, I was attacked again tonight at cheer. (Anon's Son) came into cheer and starting yelling at me. I just looked at him and shook my head. I shook my head three times. I then very calmly stated that I would not have this kind of a conversation with him with all the cheer squad around. He suggested we go outside. I agreed. We got up and starting walking toward the door, He stated "M~~~~~~~~ come on I need you" M~~~~~~~~ then yelled at R~~~~ "come on your coming too." They left their smaller children unsupervised to as I take it "gang up on me". I started to speak to (Anon's Son) and he immediately over talked me and started yelling at me. I knew this was going to go nowhere fast. I just threw my hand in the air as a sign of surrender and walked away. Please understand I was again felt threatened by this situation, There were 3 of them with all the power of cps behind them against just me. I felt very bullied and intimidated. The H~~~~ have too much influence over my son. I believe that they are negatively affecting my parental bond with (Anon's Son). (Anon's Son) is not scared of me. No one that is scared of anyone comes into a public place and starts yelling at them. (Anon's Son) shows no respect for me. I feel like this behavior is condoned by the H~~~~. I have done everything that cps has asked me to do, please help me. You are our social worker and your job is to help a family in need. We are in need of protection from the H~~~~. I would love to speak to my son. I would also like someone present as he seems to attack me at every chance. I just do not want that person to be the H~~~~. How about Sara? She strikes me as a very kind and caring person. L~~~~ likes her alot and B~~~~~ says she is sometimes "Pretty cool" Can we set up a meeting next w(ee)kend? Even if (Anon's Son) never comes home this needs to be dealt with. His younger siblings live with me and want to continue to do so, (Anon's Son) having a cordial respectful relationship with me needs to be in place. It is not (Anon's Son) who is scared of me. It is me who is scared. (Anon's Son) shows alot of confidence and attitude. He is doing what he wants when he wants and no one is stopping him. If he continues to show this kind of attitude I am very concerned what kind of person, husband and father he will be... ~ Karen Lekas |
| State
of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas On
Tue, 11/25/08, Karen Lekas wrote: Was (Anon #1's Son) sick? The messages I got stated that M~~~~~~~ had sick kids at home and (Anon #1's Son) could not come to his visitation. Is he OK? I kinda got the impression that it was not (Anon #1's Son) who was sick. If he was sick he did not miss school yesterday. SO if (Anon #1's Son) was not sick why could he not make the visitation? M~~~~~~~'s neighbor comes to cheer, he could have ridden with her. I am very frustrated. I feel like everyone is doing everything possible to keep (Anon #1's Son) away from his family. B~~~~~ flat out said he doesn't want to see (Anon #1's Son) cause (Anon #1's Son) never wants to see him.The problem we have always had with the visitation is that the foster mother always has some kind of excuse as to why we can not have a visit. When visits are allowed it only when it is convenient for them. This is not fair. If they can not comply with visits they should not foster children, especially ones that have a mother who wants them. As R~~~~ so eloquently put it, "we don't know what to do with a mother who is soo involved we are use to doing what we want when we want" (as stated in the police report). As far as the visitation in general. The way you and M~~~~~~~ set that up was in my opinion was to make it difficult for me to come. I live 22 miles from McDonald's on pyramid. I have very little income coming in. I pay everything on my own. I get no check from the state for taking care of children. I take care of 2 children on my own. They are mine I will always take care of them. I just don't think anyone cares the hardship on me to drive that far and (Anon #1's Son) not even show up. Visitation at cheer practice is wrong! L~~~~ is there to practice cheer. It is very unfair to make her have to have a visit when she is supposed to be there to concentrate on something else. If she pays attention to anything besides cheer the coaches will make her do push ups. How is that a visit? I believe with all my heart that cps is keeping (Anon #1's Son) from me on purpose. Lets just say for a minute I did not give M~~~~ that alcohol (WHICH I DID NOT) what kind of damage is cps doing here? Who are you protecting? I have been found guilty without a trail, this is cruel. I know somewhere in this county a child is hungry, is cold, is not loved, is being beaten, starved, violated and cps cant do anything about this as they have too many people working on this case.That is heart breaking. I have done everything that cps told me to do. Still my son is being kept from me. What else do you want? ~ Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas
~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Preliminary Evidence Updated July 12, 2009 |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Petitioner Bobbie Mawhorter's request for Restraining Orders are denied as the Court recognizes that David Sharra (formerly David Mawhorter) had a right to and was attempting to obtain lawful visitation with his child. Even the Petitioner indicated that Mr. Mawhorter had no intent of committing physical harm against her. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Payment to the Rainbow Center ordered by the Judge. David Sharra not given the opportunity for supervised visitation with his child through family or friends. No attempt by the Court to provide for that. The Rainbow Center has since consistantly catered to the whims of the Petitioner Bobbie Mawhorter and if she fails to show, nothing is done. Sharra's work schedule is ignored, the very source of funds by which he would pay for the supervised visitation. E-mails between Sharra and Petitioner Bobbie Mawhorter go unignored by Ms. Mawhorter, according to Sharra. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra The Court shuts down David Sharra then submits the order for his approval (?) ... The Court lends no sympathy nor understanding to the Winter months when passage over I-80 and other Sierra Nevada corridors is impossible or dangerous due to snow and ice conditions, beyond the fact the weather can be so bad that the corridors are shut down in either direction and not even chains will get you across. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Certificate of the Offical Court Report showing Judge D. Scott Daniels as the presiding Judge. Editor's note: this Publisher/Editor has no knowledge of nor any reason to believe that any family relationship exists between himself (Mark Scott Daniels) and The Honorable D. Scott Daniels, and to put it bluntly, this Publisher/Editor not impressed by Judge Daniels' orders and demeanor as it is and finds both the order and his tone abusive to say the least. This publication and its Editor side with Mr. Sharra in the belief that a great injustice is being done to him and his family by this Judge and others, particularly in Washoe County Social Services, otherwise, we wouldn't be publishing. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Cover sheet ~ Mawhorter vs Mawhorter (Sharra) |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra David Sharra must represent himself In Propia Persona or "In Pro Per" as he cannot afford an Attorney, a fact that both the Courts and Attorneys historically take tremendous advantage of at every opportunity. The interference with both Mr. Sharra's work schedule, from which his pay is derived, and the taxation of Mr. Sharra's remaining pay for "supervised visitation" at the Rainbow Center places Sharra at an even greater disadvantage. The burden of visitation is placed entirely on Mr. Sharra's back while Bobbie Mawhorter's responsibilities to have the child available at the proper place and time, along with giving Mr. Sharra reports on the child's welfare, go unenforced. Paraphrasing Jesse Jackson: A Court that allows its own orders to be contemptfully unabided by is no Court at all. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Mawhorter vs Mawhorter (Sharra) ~ The State of California abstains from procuring jurisdiction over Child Support issues and informs opposing Counsel Epstein that the Social Service issues will remain under the jurisdiction of the State of Nevada. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra The Court approaches Mr. Sharra in regards to his acceptance of the Mediation Order proposed in the case of Mawhorter vs Mawhorter (Sharra). David Mawhorter, by the way, carried his adopted family's name (Mawhorter) and recently changed his name back to his original family name, which is "Sharra." Sharra is also battling to have his child's name reflect his original family name, not that of his adopted family. That issue is still pending and the Court has rejected his arguments once so far. The matter is expected to be readdressed shortly. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Opposing Counsel Epstein takes Mr. Sharra through the "voir dire" acknowledgement of the items he agreed to and has signed in the proposed Court order. |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
![]() State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra |
State of Nevada vs Karen Lekas ~ a.k.a. Karen Lekas Mawhorter, Mrs. Karen Sharra Text of a 2007 Press Release from the Solano Superior Court announcing Judge Scott Daniels as the incoming Assistant Presiding Judge. Judge Daniels (no relation to the Editor) took over the case of Karen Lekas' husband, David Sharra, from Judge Unger and put unreasonable visitation demands on Sharra and his new wife (Karen). The basis for this was the documents leaked by Michelle Rosencrantz of Washoe County Social Services to Sharra's ex-wife, Bobbie Mawhorter, who utilized the illegal documents with Judge Daniels' after Judge Unger had instructed her to return the documents to Sharra. The documents are Privacy Act protected and Rosencrantz is alleged to have delivered the documents on Sharra's ex-wife in retaliation for Sharra calling Rosencrantz a "cunt." According to Karen and Dave, Ms. Rosencrantz has allowed her power as a Social Worker to go unreasonably to her head. |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| Updated September 14, 2009 |
| ~ Directory ~ |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| Updated September 14, 2009 |
| State
of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas P |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ State of Nevada/Washoe County vs Karen Lekas ~ |