Of course, the "Squashing" (Sagar's a moron; the word is "Quashing") of the rumor never happened, since my reports were based on telephone interview with Mr. Sherwood, followed by taped interviews with Mr. Sherwood face-to-face at the Airport Operations Building, Nut Tree Airport, Vacaville, California.

Thus, these two idiots attacked me, when all I was essentially, was the messenger; failed to attack Sherwood, the instigator of the interviews and his obviously legitimate complaints with a corrupted IF1 Board; and frankly, didn't attack the charges. Opportunity has been more than given to IF1 to respond to the charges, and we have complete silence.

In the Press, as well as a Court of Law, when you do not respond the the allegations made against you nor the supporting testimony and documents, or at least have an Attorney deny the charges, even though you still are unwilling to comment, then you are admitting that the charges are true.

Mr. Sagar, Mr. Houghton and Mr. Entriken, among others, including the RARA, RARF and AAWC, but excluding IF1 as an organization, will be shortly facing Civil and Criminal complaints involving Racketeering, Conspriracy, Civil Rights Violations, Libel and Anti-Trust activities, in conjunction with additional charges to be filed regarding an overall Conspiracy to commit Fraud against the Government and the People.

Now, we have Mr. Sagar allowing rumors to spread, and then wondering how is it that he's responsible for "screwing the dog," as he calls it.

First, he gives his word that he will not release information given to him under confidence by the subject of a story.

Second, he is not allowed to give such confidence in return due to his First Amendment responsibilities, i.e., "The Public's Right to Know," and is required to report, therefore, he should never have given the confidence in return.

Third, when the word leaked out, and discussions started on his Message Board, after giving his word, in Mr. Sagar's own words:

"Someone in RARA let the cat out, I put it back in... Some saw it, some know what it was and some were putting things in this thread that revealed it all over again so I asked to keep it to a dull roar.."

As a Journalist, which Mr. Sagar claims to be, both falsely (deliberate lie, or False Misrepresentation with intent) erroneously (False misrepresentation without intent), you are not allowed to "put the cat back in," once let out, and then lie to an individual claiming you will not release information at your site, then permit the release of information at your site.

And then to admit to it?

This is the problem with individuals trying to promote Air Racing as "Journalists" when all they are is either amateur (non-paid) or professional (paid) marketers, promoters, advertisers, whatever. Anything but Journalists, since they're not reporting news, but rather, promoting their subjects. This is a no no. You have to decide, one, or the other. You cannot do both under the same banner.

As I am half-owner of Aafo.com, without a say in the operations or a receipt of the profits, I will be filing to close Aafo.Com down as an alleged "Journalistic" operation constituting and existing as a Fraud and RICO Act organization, in support of Houghton and RARA, among others. I do not approve of what my half of the Company is being utilized for (Fraud, Racketeering, Conspiracy, Libel, Lying to the Public, First Amendment and other Civil Rights violations, and more...) by Mr. Sagar's half.

You are all to be forewarned, who have news that you want kept under wrap, to keep it under wraps yourselves. To initiate proprietary agreements with those you contract with, for the protection of your proprietary information. If you don't, what has happened to Mr. Town and the individual he refers to as Matt, is going to happen again and like Mr. Town, it will be your own fault.

There is no such thing, by Law of "Off the Record." Off the Record exists inside Journalism, but outside of the Law. A Journalist can be ordered to reveal information, and as we are seeing at Publications that were once top of the line American Journalism, their standards are being undermined by their giving in to their vioilators, Courts and Attorneys in particular, who are both persecuting and putting correspondents in jail for not revealing sources, or in general, forcing them to reveal sources against their will.

SSNS Believes that Courts forcing Journalist's to reveal their sources is a violation of the Journalist's and Public's Constitutional Rights ~ as well as a Violation of the Civil Rights of the subject of a story, if their Civil Rights have or are being violated ~ as spelled out within the First and other Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and a violation of the Constitutional and Human Rights of the source they have agreed to protect, especially if the latter knows that their lives or livelihoods are threatened.

"Freedom" is absolute. "Limited Freedom" limits freedoms and puts additional restrictions on Freedoms, Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, not to mention, Human Rights.

Here in the United States, "Freedom" (Unlimited) of the Press. Elsewhere (Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Vietnam, China, elsewhere) "Limited Freedom" means major restricitons on the Press and therefore is an oxymoron that equates to "No Freedom."

SSNS will argue in its own case, if ever necessary, that the key to Democracy which supercedes the Governments and its Courts in regards to Journalists not revealing sources, is the word "Freedom" in the Civil Right "Freedom of Press," (First Amendment), as it provides specifically not for the individual journalist, but for the greater good of Society and the Public's Right to Know, especially such things as plots against their established government or if the government is being or has been overthrown, and who the rebels are trying to take back the legitimate government from those who have overthrown said Government "Of the People, By The People and For The People," what their position is in regards to why they believe the Government is overthrown, how they will take it back, and the means to do so, and is it true that an abusive government is hiding behind the facade of an Appearance of Democracy, or more importantly, the Appearance of Limited Democracy, the latter of which the United States is in reality.

Sources have to be protected while stories are told, information is gathered and gleaned, and documentation and evidence are produced. Thus, absolute Freedom is the imperative in that, it allows the Press to protect sources, giving the Public their Right to Know and evaluate the information, then make the decision for themselves as to right from wrong, and cause decisions to be made or make decisions of their own, in regards to the events having a direct affect on their lives and those of their fellow Americans, which include rebel patriots and loyalists to the American cause of Freedom and Democracy.

However, until a Constitutional Convention or Amendment is entertained, in which "Freedom of the Press" is changed to read "Limited Freedoms of the Press," again, an oxymoron ~ our Freedoms under the First Amendment are absolute ~ and any Law made challenging the absolute Freedom of the Press, which provides for the complete sphere surrounding the Public's First Amendment Right to Know, then such Laws are Unconstitutional and Freedom reigns in the face of such Laws, even though, Journalists will face challenges to their Civil Rights that include imprisonment for failing to reveal sources, and other penalties that include fines, and violation of their own, Individual Civil Rights.

Likewise in regards to the age old fight against Corruption in Government, Business and everyday life, by Journalists, which along with War Zone coverage, produces the most deaths in our Field among Journalists.

Here in the U.S., Laws have been formulated to undermine the Press in regards to revealing sources, however, SSNS believes these Laws to be Unconstitutional and will challenge them when the time comes, as it most assuredly is coming.

We protect sources here at SSNS. We go to prison, rot and die there, before we will ever reveal a source and we do not break our word if a source asks us to keep a lid on information coming from them.

So, the outside challenges are what they are and have been for centuries. A challenge that we've been faced with in the past, which is starting to seriously rear its ugly head, is the decay of Journalistic Ethics from within, a topic that includes the infliltration of Journalism by fakes and planted vectors, and the undermining of the reputation of Mainstream Journalism by Corporate Greed, Ideology, Fraud, Treachery, Money Cults, Corrupted Morality and criminal misconduct by Journalists.

Typical of the undermining of the reputation of Mainstream Journalism by fakes, frauds and sellouts, is Mr. Wayne Sagar, of AAFO.Com. A-typical of the same is Jim Campbell, of Aero-News.Net, whose sanity is afflicted wherein, Mr. Sagar's is not. Both men know right frrom wrong, but choose to perform acts of misconduct just the same, therefore, no insanity defense for either.

We will deal with Campbell later as Sagar is on the hotseat tonight. His sellout to the Reno Air Racing Association and Mike Houghton, along with his almost total lack of knowedge regarding Journalism and Journalistic Ethics, are a primary example of fakery, planted vectors, fraud, Corporate Greed, Treachery and Ideology, inconsistant with the Standards required to be maintained by Journalists.

In regards to this "old news," which Mr. Sagar made stale via his aiding and abetting of the leaks from his own message board, after RARA's gaffe (again), had multiple reports of these activities going back weeks, even at least a month, and by God, if there was that much information out there, RARA was leaking like a sieve. Thus, I will recap my point that ~ if you are the developer or Guardian of Proprietary Information that is secure in nature ~ the best way to prevent non-disclosure of proprietary information, is to keep your own mouth shut before you go releasing proprietary information, not knowing for sure, whether you are speaking with Press or Promoters, savory or unsavory individuals, con men or philanthropists, liars or truth tellers, have been advised of whether or not secrecy can lawfully be maintained, and have Proprietary agreements protecting your information from damaging release.

We are not Attorneys here. We can only inform you of the things we do in the conduct of an investigation to see if you can be helped by the information or simply, to report what we're doing and the circumstances surrounding the events as we pursue them. We do not give legal advice and instruct you to obtain legal advice from Lawyers on matters of Law. If we receive information, we publish unless we strike a moral agreement for non-release with the parties in advance of them giving us the information they want protected. Otherwise, we do not accept the information and verbally instruct the party to keep the information to themselves to protect the information and themselves. If we make moral arrangement for non-release, we don't release and further, we never identify the source of the information without the source's expressed permission.

So what's Mr. Sagar's problem? Simply put: he's an amateur and knows nothing about Journalism, though he claims to be a Journalist, an Editor, a Publisher. To the best of our knowledge and belief, he has had nothing other than photos and captions published outside of his organization, if that. He is bought and paid for by the RARA with Pylon and Press Credentials, that are not lawful and have no bearing or authority over whether he can cover an event or not. RARA has no business issuing Press Credentials and the like. They can only verify those issued by the Publications, then must grant access to all members of the Press without discriminating, otherwise, they are clearly attempting to control the Press in a manner that suits RARA.

The complexities of Press Coverage events include more, so we will take up this issue from time to time to show you how it's done, utilizing other events and reporting on their procedures in verifying that already Credentialed members of the Press, who can only be Credentialed by their News Organization, possess lawful, legal, accurate Press Credentials, that match their name and identities.

Though Mr. Town bears the gretest responsibility for the leaks, by releasing information and by hoping, praying, that people will keep their word to him, Mr. Town has undermined his organizations efforts to do something positive in Air Racing. Worse, Mr. Sagar is running around as a fraud, a promoter and not a Journalist, accepting information, making deals to keep the information confidential, then seeing to the wholesale release of such information, and then pointing the fingers at others, when in his own words, once information was released by other parties, well he thought it was okay to release it himself.

We here at SSNS didn't release the information we had because we didn't care. Rumors are a dime a dozen. A Press Release and Press Kit are invaluable, announcing an event and keeping the facts straight, by allowing interviews with the subjects identified and involved in the Release and Events, plus contact phone numbers, addresses, e-mails, websites, and other pertinent information. We can wait on release of such information.

When SSNS learned of the news of this latest Scandal, we reported.

No one has the right to stop us, other than a Federal Judge.

No one has the right to try and control our reporting, not Wayne Sagar, not Jim Campbell, not Mike Houghton, not Tom Robinson, not the Reno P.D., not Senator William Raggio, not Mr. Raggio's Law Firm, Jones Vargas, not Mr. Town, not RARA, not the AAWC, not the FAA, the NTSB, The White House, et al, unless the matter is one of National Security and even then, the choice is ours as to whether to release or not, if in the Public's Best Interests, but knowing that we could face serious retaliation from the Government Balance of Powers. Which is to say, in regards to the latter, if we do release, we had better be right!

Situations in which this publication will not release include National Security, the Right to a Fair Trial, Classfied Documents, imminent threat to the life of another, the names of underaged minors involved in criminal prosecution or defense, preventing panic among the populace, Proprietary agreements and select proprietary information not covered by agreements to prevent unfair business practices by others or espionage, any issue where a third party may be utilizing us to blackmail another unlawfully, assisted suicide, assisted murder, advance information of Allied combat movements in a War or Battle Zone, any photographic materials related to the same, etc.

I should add that no one but I control the non-release of information, such as sources and source material (evidence, documentation, etc.).

Therefore, is it not wise to consider knowing the policies of the individuals to whom you would like to release information to under wraps, to be kept under wraps until a more appropriate time, what they can or cannot do by Law and Journalistic Ethics, and what they can or will not due after they receive the information, what their track record is on privacy and secrecy, whether they have a right to do what you ask, whether or not they will betray you or keep your confidence, what their backgrounds are, etc, etc., etc.

Do you have the experience to know whether or not secure or proprietary information should be released?

Has an alleged Journalist ever advised you prior to the release of information, in regards to whether or not the information he is seeking or you are wanting to give, is proprietary information, as I do with those I interview (we are not interested in giving away prioprietary information of law abiding businesses; we will expose proprietary information of those involved in criminal misconduct and deliberate Law violations...let there be no doubt of that!)?

Is your system of information release up-to-date, organized and secure to protect you from release of proprietary, secure and/or classified information? Can it identify obsolete information in your system versus new information you want released or withheld for proprietary reasons, per SOP (Standard Operating Procedures, for the interested novice) and Business Plan?

If not, you might want to consider re-evaluating your Information Release Programs. Definitiely try to keep them up to date and incororate new, pro-active ideas, for both your benefit and that of the consumer, which includes the Press and others.

Also, be aware of information that you cannot withhold.

Non-profit Corporations cannot withhold Public Records, Mr.. Houghton, Mr. Raggio, Mr.'s Jones and Vargas, Mr. John P. Sande III, Ms. Ann Morgan, Mr. John F. Murtha, Mr.'s Woodburn and Wedge, Mr.'s Watson and Rounds, Mr. Gribbin, Mr. Kulpin, Ms. Bart, Ms. City Attorney for Reno, Nevada, RARA, RARF, AAWC, et al, and anyone associated with your rank Conspiracy to Commit Fraud and Racketeering, to include Attempted Murder where applicable.

Just FYI. An Attorney is just a phone call away for legal advice. Contact your State Bar for assistance in that regard, particularly before the act you intend to commit to, whether it be a crime or misconduct, or conduct that is appropriate, but you're just not sure and want to get your facts and your Rights straight before you act.

A wise move that Courts, Law Enforcement, and Attorneys, good or bad in regards to the latter, endorse and praise, as does ILIPS Group, Silver State News, its Editor, Publisher, Informants and snitches! <G>.

In conclusion, this one other thing: Individuals like Mr. Sagar, who claim to have the ability or carried out the "Squashing" of rumors, then fail to do so, usually don't have the ability to keep lids on rumors as well. Having done business previously with Mr. Sagar, I would simply state based on first hand knowledge, information and belief:

...that he is totally untrustworthy with Proprietary information.

And in regards to Message Boards, they're good for very little other than Gossip, Rumors and Draining Your Pasta, considering all the leaks they seem to have in them.

Just the same, a man who gives his word not to release proprietary information given to him by you, who then allows others to release the same information on his message board, as though endorsed or actually endorsed by him in this case, and then tries to deny culpability in conjunction with others under his direct supervision, is morally wrong, unethical, has breached his verbal contract with you regarding his release of proprietary information, is likely open to Lawsuit (this is where you call an Attorney to find out for sure...), is a liar, and in general, look up the word "Untrustworthy" in the dictionary, and you'll find Wayne Sagar's picture there...or not.

They may have pulled it since he's so untrustworthy he gives the word a bad name!

The most important thing to remember is that game we all played in High School. Twenty people in a row of chairs. You feed the information to the first person, have them pass the information on. Then have the last person tell you out loud what she or he received as far as the information. Then have the initiator read from the page of information he gave to the first person. Usually, the information is radically changed.

Some will say that Message Boards are the exact same thing! They are WRONG! The information on a message board is there to be seen and is not kept secret, and you can see the course of discussion, if it's right on track or, if some misunderstanding or misinformation has caused the course of discussion to diverge from correct interpretation of the materials intially provided. So, yes, to a degree, you need interpreters, which describes one of the duties of moderators, however, if the moderator does not work for you, you're still leaving your information on a message board for others to interpret, without your presence there to assist in interpretation, because you can't handle the heat directed against you and your information by miscrants and malcontents, and the occasional coward, that wants to attack you and sabotage your informational effort.

Therefore, it is a BIG MISTAKE to allow yourself to be intimidated by unknown names and hidden faces trying to obstruct you in delivering of information to the Public on a Message Board.

You have few choices, but they are good ones!!!:

• You can participate in the Message Board, watch the course of discussion, and immediately step in to keep the information correct, by announcing whom you are, whom you represent, and the correction needing made. In that regard, you can insert yourself into the discussion at any moment the information diverges incorrectly, something you cannot do in the game, because within the game, the information must be kept secret until the end, per the game's demonstrative purpose.
• You can post a link to your website and message board with permission from the message board you wish to post the link on, and direct people to your website and message board and control the information there. Takes a burden off the moderators at the other board.
• Finally, the one we advise, though we don't accept payments for advertisers at ILIPS Group so this doesn't apply in our regards, but to the other websites out there: You can pay to advertise your website and message board, and avoid the off site Message Board and its traps/flaws/obstacles/dangers altogether.

However, whatever you do, never, NEVER (!!!!!) leave your information in the hands of outside moderators or Boards wihtout monitoring for yourself, the course of the resulting discussions, unless those Boards and their moderators are fully informed as to your proprietary business plan, meaning, they should be under contract for non-revelation of proprietary information before releasing and trusting the information to them.

You are wrong to blame the Board proprietors or their moderators, or lack thereof, if you do anything otherwise than the above. If you do it a second time, you are stupid!

In regards to the latter, stupidity ~ there is no shortage between Mike Houghton's ears and that of the Board of Directors of the Reno Air Races. They, moreso than Mr. Sagar, are the combined untrustworthiness of every scam artist currently in prison for Bunko work here in the U.S., and in that regard, their time is coming soon. Oh, and I should mention/add and the entire white collar management side of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), in terms of stupidity in powers of ten.

To do business with these types of individuals, is to do business with those who are currently involved in the destruction of Air Racing, particularly at Reno, but across the Board ~ and you have allowed infiltrators and/or are doing business with infiltrators who may have, or if you piss them off, will have the ability and intent, not to mention, motive, to destroy the good things you are trying to do for the Sport and its participants, which is in line with their collective intent at RARA/AAWC.

You've just let the fox into the henhouse, in other words. Or worse, considering that the "Foghorn Leghorn Gang" as I like to call them, strut like roosters in their red RARA jackets and operate more like cannibals, rather than the protector of your hens (people) and their eggs (dreams), harm to which could upset the financial balance of your farm (project/production). Even destroy it in hard times, which is what we have with the current fuel price crisis and your project involves expenditure of moneys for fuel in racing aircraft.

Mexico, with its own, growing, oil producing industries, well, they might have a better price on AV Gas considering the fuel price crisis is an attack aimed at both the United States and England, primarily. Prices are dirt cheap in other countries our equals, and pennies in developing third world nations, like Mexico. The banks their love to fund you, especially if you're an independent like Mexico's legendary film director, Robbie Rodriguez (El Mariachi, Desperado, Four Rooms), with some talent to offer.

Someone violates Proprietary agreement with me, or their verbal word, as is the case with RARA and this film producer according even to their bought mouthpice, Wayne Sagar, and I say it's time to check out new horizons.

I mean, promising not to release proprietary information, and then releasing proprietary information ~ what a bunch of amateurs.

I hear the horizons are pretty in Mexico, where you can watch Air Racers on the course while sipping away on a Margarita with salt and lime in your Director's chair, surrounded by plates of good, hot, fresh, nourishing, Mexican food, or having a conversation with the worm in the bottle of Mescal about the pain of a business relationship with Houghton, RARA, Sagar et al, and how your pleasantly embalmned friend going to help cure that for you.

You know, , I hear the worm in a bottle of Mexcal is preferred 100 to 1 over the bartenders ear?

The Only dissenting voice ~ Mike Tyson, after receiving a bad tattoo in the form of a RARA Girl Nose Art!

From a Bartender, of course...

Well, in conclusion, nice to know there are so many Players out there in the World. Unfortunately, what Mr. Town apparently ran into, was a troupe of "Bad Actors." And when it's your production, your money, that they're "Playing" with, the last thing you need is "Bad Actors" * in the mix!

That is all...for now.

* bad actor n.

One that consistently behaves or reacts poorly.